MillerKnoll, Inc. Reports First Quarter Fiscal 2025 Results
ZEELAND, Mich., Sept. 19, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — MillerKnoll Inc. MLKN today reported results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, which ended August 31, 2024.
Financial Highlights
- Orders in the first quarter were up 2.4% on a reported basis and up 3.5% organically from the prior year, led by Americas Contract growth of 5.2%.
- Ending backlog of $758.0 million increased 9.2% from last year and 10.9% from the start of fiscal 2025.
- Gross margin in the Global Retail segment improved by 160 basis points due to continued benefits from operational improvements.
First Quarter Fiscal 2025 Financial Results
(Unaudited) |
|||
Three Months Ended |
|||
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) |
August 31, 2024 |
September 2, 2023 |
% Chg. |
(13 weeks) |
(13 weeks) |
||
Net sales |
$ 861.5 |
$ 917.7 |
(6.1) % |
Gross margin % |
39.0 % |
39.0 % |
N/A |
Operating expenses |
$ 321.1 |
$ 317.8 |
1.0 % |
Adjusted operating expenses* |
$ 286.9 |
$ 302.7 |
(5.2) % |
Effective tax rate |
66.2 % |
24.4 % |
N/A |
Adjusted effective tax rate* |
21.5 % |
24.6 % |
N/A |
(Loss) earnings per share – diluted(1) |
$ (0.02) |
$ 0.22 |
N/A |
Adjusted earnings per share – diluted*(1) |
$ 0.36 |
$ 0.37 |
(2.7) % |
*Items indicated represent Non-GAAP measurements; see the reconciliations of Non-GAAP financial measures and related explanations below. (1)Due to the anti-dilutive effect resulting from periods where the Company reports a net loss, the impact of potentially dilutive securities on the per share amounts has been omitted from the calculation of weighted-average common shares outstanding for diluted net loss per common share. |
To our shareholders:
MillerKnoll finished the first quarter with momentum and order growth. Demand is improving and our Contract business is seeing the return of larger projects in the Americas and Asia. Customers are also requesting shipment dates on new orders further into the future, on average, compared to previous years. As a result, our teams around the globe continue to control what they can by managing operating expenses to align with sales levels while advancing initiatives aimed at positioning the business for further growth as demand trends accelerate.
While demand trends in our Retail segment continue to reflect the impact of a tepid housing market, the investments we have made in platform operational capabilities are not only driving significant margin improvements, but also position us to support profitable growth plans as the macro-economic backdrop improves. We believe our first quarter financial results demonstrate the advantage of our collective of brands, diverse business channels and global footprint.
First Quarter Fiscal 2025 Consolidated Results
Consolidated net sales for the first quarter were $861.5 million, reflecting a decrease of 6.1% year-over- year and a decrease of 5.3% organically compared to the same period last year. Orders in the quarter of $935.9 million were up 2.4% as reported and 3.5% on an organic basis.
Gross margin in the quarter was 39.0%, which is flat with the same quarter last year despite the lower revenue level.
Consolidated operating expenses for the quarter were $321.1 million, compared to $317.8 million in the prior year. Consolidated adjusted operating expenses were $286.9 million, a decrease of $15.8 million year-over-year, driven by variability on lower net sales and the impact of cost synergies achieved through the acquisition of Knoll.
Operating margin for the quarter was 1.8% compared to 4.4% in the same quarter last year. On an adjusted basis, consolidated operating margin for the quarter was 5.8% compared to 6.0% in the same quarter last year.
We reported a diluted loss per share of $0.02 for the quarter, compared to diluted earnings per share of $0.22 for the same period last year. Adjusted diluted earnings per share were $0.36 for the quarter compared to $0.37 for the same period last year.
As of August 31, 2024, our liquidity position reflected cash on hand and availability on our revolving credit facility totaling $488.4 million. During the first quarter, the business generated $21.1 million of cash flow from operations. We repurchased approximately 1.5 million shares for a total cash outlay of $43.7 million. We ended the first quarter with a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio, as defined by our lending agreement, of 2.84x. Our scheduled debt maturities (which exclude the maturity of the revolver) for the remainder of fiscal year 2025, and for fiscal years 2026 and 2027 are $34.5 million, $46.8 million and $276.4 million respectively.
First Quarter Fiscal 2025 Results by Segment
Americas Contract
For the first quarter, Americas Contract net sales of $454.6 million were down 7.3% on a reported basis and down 7.0% organically compared to the same period last year. New orders totaled $512.7 million and were up 5.2% from the previous year and increased sequentially by 6.8% from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024. Orders gained momentum throughout the quarter, with the highest levels in August. Leading indicators, such as project funnel additions, customer mock-up requests and new contract activations were up year-over-year and underscore an improving demand picture.
Operating margin in the quarter was 3.8% compared to operating margin of 8.4% in the prior year. On an adjusted basis, operating margin was 9.5% in the quarter, which is down 110 basis points compared to the same quarter last year primarily due to the loss of leverage of fixed costs on lower sales volume.
International Contract and Specialty
International Contract and Specialty segment net sales in the first quarter of $213.5 million were down 6.5% on a reported basis and down 6.3% on an organic basis year-over-year. Orders during the quarter totaled $234.1 million, resulting in a year-over-year increase of 2.7% on a reported basis and 3.1% organically, with the APMEA region leading in order growth.
Operating margin for the first quarter was 4.4% compared to 5.0% in the prior year. On an adjusted basis, operating margin for the quarter was 7.9%, up 140 basis points year-over-year, driven by previous cost reduction initiatives.
Global Retail
For the first quarter, our Global Retail segment sales totaled $193.4 million. This represents a year-over-year decline of 2.8% on a reported basis, and was essentially flat on an organic basis. Orders in the quarter totaled $189.1 million, down 4.7% compared to the same period last year on a reported basis and down 1.6% on an organic basis.
While soft conditions exist within the housing market, we remain focused on driving operational improvements. These efforts helped drive a year-over-year gross margin improvement of 160 basis points. Operating margin for the first quarter was 2.3% compared to 1.1% in the prior year. On an adjusted basis, operating margin for the quarter was 2.8%, which was 120 basis points higher than the prior year, driven by operational efficiencies.
In addition, we continue to execute programs to drive growth as macro-economic conditions improve. In North America, we estimate that we outperformed year-on-year retail industry comparisons by approximately 6 points during the quarter.(2) We expect to gain momentum fueled by a focus on product assortment expansion, design services and investment behind new store openings in the back-half of fiscal year 2025 and beyond.
Additional Highlights from Q1
Building engaging showroom experiences remains a priority for MillerKnoll. During the first quarter, we held successful client engagement events in our Chicago showrooms during Design Days. We continue to enhance our showrooms to feature the full breadth of our collective of brands and recently opened new MillerKnoll showrooms in London and New York.
We also demonstrated our ongoing commitment to designing for the future with new sustainable solutions, including the Eames Lounge Chair and Ottoman in a bamboo-based leather alternative. We also continued to deliver for our teams, offering programs to support associates, and earning a Great Place to Work® certification and “Best Place to Work for Disability Inclusion” status in the 2024 Disability Equality Index by Disability:IN®.
In support of our long-term growth plans, we evaluated the composition of our board of directors given the retirement of two directors since 2022. During the first quarter, we recruited three new members with expertise in technology, architecture, design and hospitality to augment the expertise of our current board.
(2) Estimate based on a comparison of MillerKnoll North American Retail sales trends to a composite data set comprised of information from the National Retail Federation, the U.S. Census Bureau, and two national U.S. commercial banks for the months of June, July and August 2024. |
Second Quarter and Fiscal 2025 Outlook
We are maintaining our full year adjusted earnings guidance of $2.20 per share, which equates to the mid-point range we provided in June. This is supported by the positive trends we are seeing in global contract demand, our increased backlog position and expected macro-economic improvements in the back half of this fiscal year.
As it relates to the second quarter of fiscal year 2025, we expect net sales to range between $950 million to $990 million. Adjusted diluted earnings in the second quarter are expected between $0.51 – $0.57 per share.
This guidance takes into consideration a shift in the holiday/cyber promotional period for our retail business. Last year the full promotional period fell in the second quarter, while this year it will be split between the second and third quarters. Relative to last year’s revenue pacing, we estimate this shift in timing will move between $17 million and $23 million of net sales from the second quarter into the third quarter of this fiscal year. This is an important factor to consider when comparing quarterly sales and earnings estimates to our performance last fiscal year.
Webcast and Conference Call Information
The Company will host a conference call and webcast to discuss the results of the first quarter of fiscal 2025 on Thursday, September 19, 2024, at 5:00 PM ET. To ensure participation, allow extra time to visit the Company’s website at https://www.millerknoll.com/investor-relations/news-events/events-and-presentations to download the streaming software necessary to participate. An online archive of the webcast will also be available on the Company’s investor relations website. Additional links to materials supporting the release will also be available at https://www.millerknoll.com/investor-relations.
Financial highlights for the three months ended August 31, 2024 follow:
MillerKnoll, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|||||
(Unaudited) (Dollars in millions, except per share and common share data) |
Three Months Ended |
||||
August 31, 2024 |
September 2, 2023 |
||||
Net sales |
$ 861.5 |
100.0 % |
$ 917.7 |
100.0 % |
|
Cost of sales |
525.2 |
61.0 % |
559.6 |
61.0 % |
|
Gross margin |
336.3 |
39.0 % |
358.1 |
39.0 % |
|
Operating expenses |
321.1 |
37.3 % |
317.8 |
34.6 % |
|
Operating earnings |
15.2 |
1.8 % |
40.3 |
4.4 % |
|
Other expenses, net |
16.9 |
2.0 % |
19.2 |
2.1 % |
|
(Loss) earnings before income taxes and equity income |
(1.7) |
(0.2) % |
21.1 |
2.3 % |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
(1.1) |
(0.1) % |
5.1 |
0.6 % |
|
Equity income, net of tax |
0.1 |
— % |
0.1 |
— % |
|
Net (loss) earnings |
(0.5) |
(0.1) % |
16.1 |
1.8 % |
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
0.7 |
0.1 % |
(0.6) |
(0.1) % |
|
Net (loss) earnings attributable to MillerKnoll, Inc. |
$ (1.2) |
(0.1) % |
$ 16.7 |
1.8 % |
|
Amounts per common share attributable to MillerKnoll, Inc. |
|||||
(Loss) earnings per share – basic |
($0.02) |
$0.22 |
|||
Weighted average basic common shares |
70,206,373 |
75,327,544 |
|||
(Loss) earnings per share – diluted |
($0.02) |
$0.22 |
|||
Weighted average diluted common shares |
70,206,373 |
75,707,536 |
|||
MillerKnoll, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
|||
Three Months Ended |
|||
(Unaudited) (Dollars in millions) |
August 31, 2024 |
September 2, 2023 |
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|||
Operating activities |
$ 21.1 |
$ 130.9 |
|
Investing activities |
(22.3) |
(26.3) |
|
Financing activities |
(20.3) |
(111.1) |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
0.8 |
0.5 |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
(20.7) |
(6.0) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
230.4 |
223.5 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ 209.7 |
$ 217.5 |
|
MillerKnoll, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|||
(Unaudited) (Dollars in millions) |
August 31, 2024 |
June 1, 2024 |
|
ASSETS |
|||
Current Assets: |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ 209.7 |
$ 230.4 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
277.3 |
308.3 |
|
Unbilled accounts receivable |
42.3 |
22.2 |
|
Inventories, net |
440.5 |
428.6 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
102.0 |
80.1 |
|
Total current assets |
1,071.8 |
1,069.6 |
|
Net property and equipment |
490.1 |
492.0 |
|
Right of use assets |
372.2 |
375.6 |
|
Other assets |
2,085.0 |
2,106.4 |
|
Total Assets |
$ 4,019.1 |
$ 4,043.6 |
|
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS & |
|||
Current Liabilities: |
|||
Accounts payable |
$ 236.1 |
$ 241.4 |
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt |
45.9 |
43.5 |
|
Short-term lease liability |
73.1 |
67.2 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
320.6 |
345.6 |
|
Total current liabilities |
675.7 |
697.7 |
|
Long-term debt |
1,324.0 |
1,291.7 |
|
Lease liabilities |
375.1 |
360.4 |
|
Other liabilities |
235.2 |
234.8 |
|
Total Liabilities |
2,610.0 |
2,584.6 |
|
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests |
76.6 |
73.9 |
|
Stockholders’ Equity |
1,332.5 |
1,385.1 |
|
Total Liabilities, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Stockholders’ Equity |
$ 4,019.1 |
$ 4,043.6 |
|
Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Supplemental Data
This presentation contains non-GAAP financial measures that are not in accordance with, nor an alternative to, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and may be different from non-GAAP measures presented by other companies. These non-GAAP financial measures are not measurements of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to the related GAAP measurement. These non-GAAP measures have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Our presentation of non-GAAP measures should not be construed as an indication that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or infrequent items. We compensate for these limitations by providing equal prominence of our GAAP results. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP are provided in the financial tables included within this presentation. The Company believes these non-GAAP measures are useful for investors as they provide financial information on a more comparative basis for the periods presented.
The non-GAAP financial measures referenced within this presentation include: Adjusted Effective Tax Rate, Adjusted Operating Earnings (Loss), Adjusted Operating Margin, Adjusted Earnings per Share, Adjusted Gross Margin, Adjusted Operating Expenses, Adjusted Bank Covenant EBITDA, and Organic Growth (Decline).
Adjusted Effective Tax Rate refers to the projected full-year GAAP tax rate, adjusted to exclude certain unusual or infrequent events that are expected to significantly impact that rate as well as impacts related to enactments of comprehensive tax law changes.
Adjusted Operating Earnings (Loss) represents reported operating earnings plus integration charges, amortization of Knoll purchased intangibles, restructuring expenses, and Knoll pension plan termination charges. These adjustments are described further below.
Adjusted Operating Margin is calculated as adjusted operating earnings (loss) divided by net sales.
Adjusted Earnings per Share represents reported diluted earnings per share excluding the impact from amortization of Knoll purchased intangibles, integration charges, restructuring expenses, Knoll pension plan termination charges and the related tax effect of these adjustments. These adjustments are described further below.
Adjusted Gross Margin represents gross margin plus integration charges. These adjustments are described further below.
Adjusted Operating Expenses represents reported operating expenses excluding restructuring charges, integration charges, amortization of Knoll purchased intangibles, and Knoll pension plan termination charges. These adjustments are described further below.
Adjusted Bank Covenant EBITDA is calculated by excluding depreciation, amortization, interest expense, taxes from net income, and certain other adjustments. Other adjustments include, as applicable in the period, charges associated with business restructuring actions, integration charges, impairment expenses, non-cash stock-based compensation, future synergies, and other items as described in our lending agreements.
Organic Growth (Decline) represents the change in sales and orders, excluding currency translation effects and the impact of the closure of the Hay eCommerce channel in North America.
The adjustments to arrive at these non-GAAP financial measures are as follows:
Amortization of Knoll purchased intangibles: Includes expenses associated with the amortization of acquisition related intangibles acquired as part of the Knoll acquisition. The revenue generated by the associated intangible assets has not been excluded from the related non-GAAP financial measure. We exclude the impact of the amortization of Knoll purchased intangibles as such non-cash amounts were significantly impacted by the size of the Knoll acquisition. Furthermore, we believe that this adjustment enables better comparison of our results as Amortization of Knoll Purchased Intangibles will not recur in future periods once such intangible assets have been fully amortized. Any future acquisitions may result in the amortization of additional intangible assets. Although we exclude the Amortization of Knoll Purchased Intangibles in these non-GAAP measures, we believe that it is important for investors to understand that such intangible assets were recorded as part of purchase accounting and contribute to revenue generation.
Integration charges: Knoll integration-related costs include severance, accelerated stock-based compensation expenses, asset impairment charges associated with lease and operations facility consolidation activity, and expenses related to synergy realization efforts and reorganization initiatives.
Restructuring charges: Includes costs associated with actions involving targeted workforce reductions.
Knoll pension plan termination charges: Includes expenses incurred associated with the termination of the Knoll pension plan.
Tax related items: We excluded the income tax benefit/provision effect of the tax related items from our non-GAAP measures because they are not associated with the tax expense on our ongoing operating results.
Certain tables below summarize select financial information, for the periods indicated, related to each of the Company’s reportable segments. The Americas Contract (“Americas”) segment includes the operations associated with the design, manufacture and sale of furniture products directly or indirectly through an independent dealership network for office, healthcare, and educational environments throughout North and South America. The International Contract and Specialty (“International & Specialty”) segment includes the operations associated with the design, manufacture and sale of furniture products, indirectly or directly through an independent dealership network in Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific as well as the global operations of the Specialty brands, which include Holly Hunt, Spinneybeck, Maharam, Edelman, and Knoll Textiles. The Global Retail (“Retail”) segment includes global operations associated with the sale of modern design furnishings and accessories to third party retailers, as well as direct to consumer sales through eCommerce, direct-mail catalogs, and physical retail stores. Corporate costs represent unallocated expenses related to general corporate functions, including, but not limited to, certain legal, executive, corporate finance, information technology, administrative and integration-related costs.
A. Reconciliation of Operating Earnings (Loss) to Adjusted Operating Earnings (Loss) by Segment |
||||
Three Months Ended |
||||
August 31, 2024 |
September 2, 2023 |
|||
Americas Contract |
||||
Net sales |
$ 454.6 |
100.0 % |
$ 490.4 |
100.0 % |
Gross margin |
154.1 |
33.9 % |
174.8 |
35.6 % |
Total operating expenses |
137.0 |
30.1 % |
133.4 |
27.2 % |
Operating earnings |
$ 17.1 |
3.8 % |
$ 41.4 |
8.4 % |
Adjustments |
||||
Restructuring charges |
— |
— % |
4.3 |
0.9 % |
Integration charges |
22.5 |
4.9 % |
3.1 |
0.6 % |
Amortization of Knoll purchased intangibles |
3.2 |
0.7 % |
3.2 |
0.7 % |
Knoll pension plan termination charges |
0.5 |
0.1 % |
— |
— % |
Adjusted operating earnings |
$ 43.3 |
9.5 % |
$ 52.0 |
10.6 % |
International Contract & Specialty |
||||
Net sales |
$ 213.5 |
100.0 % |
$ 228.3 |
100.0 % |
Gross margin |
95.1 |
44.5 % |
96.9 |
42.4 % |
Total operating expenses |
85.8 |
40.2 % |
85.5 |
37.5 % |
Operating earnings |
$ 9.3 |
4.4 % |
$ 11.4 |
5.0 % |
Adjustments |
||||
Restructuring charges |
— |
— % |
0.7 |
0.3 % |
Integration charges |
5.5 |
2.6 % |
0.7 |
0.3 % |
Amortization of Knoll purchased intangibles |
2.0 |
0.9 % |
2.1 |
0.9 % |
Adjusted operating earnings |
$ 16.8 |
7.9 % |
$ 14.9 |
6.5 % |
Global Retail |
||||
Net sales |
$ 193.4 |
100.0 % |
$ 199.0 |
100.0 % |
Gross margin |
87.1 |
45.0 % |
86.4 |
43.4 % |
Total operating expenses |
82.6 |
42.7 % |
84.2 |
42.3 % |
Operating earnings |
$ 4.5 |
2.3 % |
$ 2.2 |
1.1 % |
Adjustments |
||||
Restructuring charges |
— |
— % |
0.2 |
0.1 % |
Integration charges |
0.3 |
0.2 % |
— |
— % |
Amortization of Knoll purchased intangibles |
0.7 |
0.4 % |
0.7 |
0.4 % |
Adjusted operating earnings |
$ 5.5 |
2.8 % |
$ 3.1 |
1.6 % |
Corporate |
||||
Operating expenses |
$ 15.7 |
— % |
$ 14.7 |
— % |
Operating (loss) |
$ (15.7) |
— % |
$ (14.7) |
— % |
Adjustments |
||||
Integration charges |
— |
— % |
0.1 |
— % |
Adjusted operating (loss) |
$ (15.7) |
— % |
$ (14.6) |
— % |
MillerKnoll, Inc. |
||||
Net sales |
$ 861.5 |
100.0 % |
$ 917.7 |
100.0 % |
Gross margin |
336.3 |
39.0 % |
358.1 |
39.0 % |
Total operating expenses |
321.1 |
37.3 % |
317.8 |
34.6 % |
Operating earnings |
$ 15.2 |
1.8 % |
$ 40.3 |
4.4 % |
Adjustments |
||||
Restructuring charges |
— |
— % |
5.2 |
0.6 % |
Integration charges |
28.3 |
3.3 % |
3.9 |
0.4 % |
Amortization of Knoll purchased intangibles |
5.9 |
0.7 % |
6.0 |
0.7 % |
Knoll pension plan termination charges |
0.5 |
0.1 % |
— |
— % |
Adjusted operating earnings |
$ 49.9 |
5.8 % |
$ 55.4 |
6.0 % |
B. Reconciliation of (Loss) Earnings per Share to Adjusted Earnings per Share |
||
Three Months Ended |
||
August 31, 2024 |
September 2, 2023 |
|
(Loss) earnings per share – diluted |
$ (0.02) |
$ 0.22 |
Add: Amortization of Knoll purchased intangibles |
0.08 |
0.08 |
Add: Integration charges |
0.40 |
0.07 |
Add: Restructuring charges |
— |
0.05 |
Add: Knoll pension plan termination charges |
0.01 |
— |
Tax impact on adjustments |
(0.11) |
(0.05) |
Adjusted earnings per share – diluted |
$ 0.36 |
$ 0.37 |
Weighted average shares outstanding (used for calculating adjusted earnings per share) – diluted |
70,206,373 |
75,707,536 |
C. Reconciliation of Gross Margin to Adjusted Gross Margin |
||||
Three Months Ended |
||||
August 31, 2024 |
September 2, 2023 |
|||
Gross margin |
$ 336.3 |
39.0 % |
$ 358.1 |
39.0 % |
Integration charges |
0.5 |
0.1 % |
— |
— % |
Adjusted gross margin |
$ 336.8 |
39.1 % |
$ 358.1 |
39.0 % |
D. Reconciliation of Operating Expenses to Adjusted Operating Expenses |
||||
Three Months Ended |
||||
August 31, 2024 |
September 2, 2023 |
|||
Operating expenses |
$ 321.1 |
37.3 % |
$ 317.8 |
34.6 % |
Restructuring charges |
— |
— % |
5.2 |
0.6 % |
Integration charges |
27.8 |
3.2 % |
3.9 |
0.4 % |
Amortization of Knoll purchased intangibles |
5.9 |
0.7 % |
6.0 |
0.7 % |
Knoll pension plan termination charges |
0.5 |
0.1 % |
— |
— % |
Adjusted operating expenses |
$ 286.9 |
33.3 % |
$ 302.7 |
33.0 % |
E. Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Adjusted Bank Covenant EBITDA and Adjusted Bank Covenant EBITDA Ratio (provided |
|
August 31, 2024 |
|
Net earnings |
$ 64.3 |
Income tax expense |
8.5 |
Depreciation expense |
115.2 |
Amortization expense |
37.2 |
Interest expense |
76.8 |
Other adjustments(*) |
110.5 |
Adjusted bank covenant EBITDA |
$ 412.5 |
Total debt, less cash, end of trailing period (includes outstanding LC’s) |
$ 1,170.7 |
Net debt to adjusted bank covenant EBITDA ratio |
2.84 |
*Items indicated represent Non-GAAP measurements; see the reconciliations of Non-GAAP financial measures and |
F. Organic Sales Growth by Segment |
||||
Three Months Ended |
||||
August 31, 2024 |
||||
Americas Contract |
International |
Global Retail |
Total |
|
Net sales, as reported |
$ 454.6 |
$ 213.5 |
$ 193.4 |
$ 861.5 |
% change from PY |
(7.3) % |
(6.5) % |
(2.8) % |
(6.1) % |
Adjustments |
||||
Currency translation effects (1) |
1.4 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
Net sales, organic |
$ 456.0 |
$ 214.0 |
$ 194.3 |
$ 864.3 |
% change from PY |
(7.0) % |
(6.3) % |
0.4 % |
(5.3) % |
Three Months Ended |
||||
September 2, 2023 |
||||
Americas Contract |
International |
Global Retail |
Total |
|
Net sales, as reported |
$ 490.4 |
$ 228.3 |
$ 199.0 |
$ 917.7 |
Adjustments |
||||
HAY eCommerce |
— |
— |
(5.5) |
(5.5) |
Net sales, organic |
$ 490.4 |
$ 228.3 |
$ 193.5 |
$ 912.2 |
(1) Currency translation effects represent the estimated net impact of translating current period sales and orders using the average exchange rates applicable |
G. Organic Order Growth by Segment |
||||
Three Months Ended |
||||
August 31, 2024 |
||||
Americas Contract |
International |
Global Retail |
Total |
|
Orders, as reported |
$ 512.7 |
$ 234.1 |
$ 189.1 |
$ 935.9 |
% change from PY |
5.2 % |
2.7 % |
(4.7) % |
2.4 % |
Adjustments |
||||
Currency translation effects (1) |
2.4 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
4.5 |
Orders, organic |
$ 515.1 |
$ 235.0 |
$ 190.3 |
$ 940.4 |
% change from PY |
5.7 % |
3.1 % |
(1.6) % |
3.5 % |
Three Months Ended |
||||
September 2, 2023 |
||||
Americas Contract |
International |
Global Retail |
Total |
|
Orders, as reported |
$ 487.3 |
$ 227.9 |
$ 198.5 |
$ 913.7 |
Adjustments |
||||
HAY eCommerce |
— |
— |
(5.1) |
(5.1) |
Orders, organic |
$ 487.3 |
$ 227.9 |
$ 193.4 |
$ 908.6 |
(1) Currency translation effects represent the estimated net impact of translating current period sales and orders using the average exchange rates applicable to |
H. Reconciliation of Effective Tax Rate to Adjusted Effective Tax Rate |
||
Three Months Ended |
||
August 31, 2024 |
September 2, 2023 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense, as reported (GAAP) |
$ (1.1) |
$ 5.1 |
Effective Tax Rate |
66.2 % |
24.4 % |
Adjustments |
||
Restructuring charges |
— |
1.0 |
Integration charges |
6.7 |
1.3 |
Amortization of Knoll purchased intangibles |
1.4 |
1.5 |
Knoll pension plan termination charges |
0.1 |
— |
Income tax (benefit) expense, adjusted |
7.1 |
8.9 |
Adjusted Effective Tax Rate |
21.5 % |
24.6 % |
I. Consolidated MillerKnoll Backlog |
|
Q1 FY2025 |
|
MillerKnoll backlog |
$758.0 |
J. Sales and Earnings Guidance – Upcoming Quarter |
|
Company Guidance |
|
Q2 FY2025 |
|
Net sales |
$950 million to $990 million |
Gross margin % |
38.5% to 39.5% |
Operating expenses |
$305 million to $315 million |
Interest and other expense, net |
$17.3 million to $18.3 million |
Effective tax rate |
20.5% to 22.5% |
Adjusted earnings per share – diluted |
$0.51 – $0.57 |
About MillerKnoll
MillerKnoll is a collective of dynamic brands that comes together to design the world we live in. MillerKnoll brand portfolio includes Herman Miller, Knoll, Colebrook Bosson Saunders, DatesWeiser, Design Within Reach, Edelman, Geiger, HAY, Holly Hunt, Knoll Textiles, Maharam, Muuto, NaughtOne, and Spinneybeck|FilzFelt. MillerKnoll is an unparalleled platform that redefines modern for the 21st century by building a more sustainable, equitable and beautiful future for all.
Forward-Looking Statements
This communication includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements relate to future events and anticipated results of operations, business strategies, the anticipated benefits of our acquisition of Knoll, the anticipated impact of the Knoll acquisition on the combined Company’s business and future financial and operating results, the expected amount and timing of synergies from the Knoll acquisition, and other aspects of our operations or operating results. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by phrases such as “will,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “foresees,” “forecasts,” “estimates” or other words or phrases of similar import. It is uncertain whether any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do, what impact they will have on the results of operations and financial condition of MillerKnoll or the price of MillerKnoll’s stock. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond MillerKnoll’s control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: general economic conditions; the impact of any government policies and actions to protect the health and safety of individuals or to maintain the functioning of national or global economies, and the Company’s response to any such policies and actions; the impact of public health crises, such as pandemics and epidemics; risks related to the additional debt incurred in connection with the Knoll acquisition; MillerKnoll’s ability to comply with its debt covenants and obligations; the risk that the anticipated benefits of the Knoll acquisition will be more costly to realize than expected; the effect of the Knoll acquisition on the ability of MillerKnoll to retain and hire key personnel and maintain relationships with customers, suppliers and others with whom MillerKnoll does business, or on MillerKnoll’s operating results and business generally; the ability to successfully integrate Knoll’s operations; the ability of MillerKnoll to implement its plans, forecasts and other expectations with respect to MillerKnoll’s business after the completion of the Knoll acquisition and realize expected synergies; business disruption following the Knoll acquisition; the availability and pricing of raw materials; the financial strength of our dealers and the financial strength of our customers; the success of newly-introduced products; the pace and level of government procurement; and the outcome of pending litigation or governmental audits or investigations. For additional information about other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, please refer to MillerKnoll’s periodic reports and other filings with the SEC, including the risk factors identified in MillerKnoll’s most recent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Reports on Form 10-K. The forward-looking statements included in this communication are made only as of the date hereof. MillerKnoll does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, except as required by law.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/millerknoll-inc-reports-first-quarter-fiscal-2025-results-302253568.html
SOURCE MillerKnoll
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Astrotech Reports Fiscal Year 2024 Financial Results
AUSTIN, Texas, Sept. 19, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Astrotech Corporation ASTC (the “Company” or “Astrotech”) reported its financial results for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Financial Highlights & Fiscal Year Developments
- Revenue increased to $1.7 million as Astrotech’s subsidiary, 1st Detect, gained traction in the international passenger market with its explosives trace detectors (“ETD”). Gross margin increased to 45% for the year compared to 41% in the prior period, due to a higher proportion of recurring revenue.
- The U.S. Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) approved the TRACER 1000 for the Air Cargo Security Technology List, which permits air cargo companies in the United States to use our equipment in their operations. This action advances the TRACER 1000 to Stage II testing and allows us to sell the TRACER 1000 to air cargo companies in the United States. In Stage II testing, the Company will begin field trials with the TSA. If field trials are successful, the TRACER 1000 will be added to the “qualified” list.
- The Company has entered into Developmental Test and Evaluation in which the Transportation Security Laboratory (“TSL”) will test the TRACER 1000 and work with 1st Detect to ensure its readiness to enter certification testing for TSA checkpoint testing. The certification test is then completed by the Independent Test & Evaluation department of TSL. As of the fiscal year 2023 budget the TSA had over 6,000 ETD units at checkpoint and baggage screening points which we believe would benefit from utilizing our AMS Technology.
- 1st Detect began accepting orders for the TRACER 1000 Narcotics Trace Detector (“NTD”) from worldwide customers. The TRACER 1000 NTD is a high-performance laboratory instrument capable of rapid detection of trace levels of narcotic compounds in seconds. The TRACER 1000 NTD and the TRACER 1000 ETD together provide a comprehensive protection platform that can be applied across various markets including airports, border security, checkpoint, cargo, and infrastructure security, correctional facilities, military, and law enforcement.
- The TRACER 1000 NTD and the TRACER 1000 ETD are now registered with the U.S. General Services Administration (“GSA”) IT Schedule 70 under Contract No. GS-35F-250GA with SRI Group LLC, Special Item Number 334290. The IT Schedule 70 is a long-term contract issued by the GSA to commercial technology vendors that allows sales to the U.S. federal government, one of the largest buyers of goods and services in the world. 1st Detect continues to showcase the TRACER 1000 NTD and TRACER 1000 ETD at trade events in the U.S.
- We announced the formation of a new wholly-owned subsidiary, Pro-Control, and Astrotech’s entry into an exclusive license with Pro-Control to utilize our Astrotech Mass Spectrometer Technology™ (the “AMS Technology”) for industrial process control applications involving chemical distillation outside of the agriculture industry. Pro-Control uses advanced mass spectrometer instrumentation to monitor and control the production and operations of manufacturing processes using real-time, in-process samples.
- AgLAB Inc. (“AgLAB”) and SC Laboratories (“SC Labs”) entered into a master lease agreement providing for the joint marketing of the AgLAB 1000-D2™ mass spectrometer and the AgLAB Maximum Value Process™ (“MVP™”) testing method to SC Labs’ clients. SC Labs is an industry leader that provides the regulatory requirement of a Certificate of Analysis for all movement and sale of all processed cannabis CBD or THC oils.
- Astrotech presented the AgLAB MVP™ at MJBizcon. The MVP™ is an innovative process control system to increase the potency of ending-weight yields and revenue by 20% or more using AgLAB’s proprietary integration of the AMS Technology.
- Astrotech’s consolidated balance sheet remains strong with $31.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and liquid investments which is anticipated to support the Company’s research and development, organic growth, and potential acquisition targets.
“Our mission is to expand access to the precision of mass spectrometry for companies in our target markets. We intend to achieve our mission through simplification, customization, automation, and configuration to provide relevant real-time solutions. Our TRACER 1000 has been TSA approved for air cargo and is also on the GSA, and we are currently accepting orders. Both our NTDs and ETDs are being showcased at tradeshows around the U.S. Our gross profit is growing, and we look to increasing revenue in subsequent fiscal years,” stated Thomas B. Pickens, III, Astrotech’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer.
About Astrotech Corporation
Astrotech ASTC is a mass spectrometry company that launches, manages, and commercializes scalable companies based on its innovative core technology through its wholly-owned subsidiaries. 1st Detect develops, manufactures, and sells trace detectors for use in the security and detection market. AgLAB develops and sells chemical analyzers for use in the agriculture market. Pro-Control is developing the mass spectrometry technology for use in chemical manufacturing processes. BreathTech is developing a breath analysis tool to screen for volatile organic compounds that could indicate bodily infections and critical conditions. Astrotech is headquartered in Austin, Texas. For information, please visit www.astrotechcorp.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, trends, and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be materially different from the forward-looking statement. These factors include, but are not limited to, the adverse impact of inflationary pressures, including significant increases in fuel costs, global economic conditions and events related to these conditions, including the ongoing wars in Ukraine and the Middle East and the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s use of proceeds from the common stock offerings, whether we can successfully complete the development of our new products and proprietary technologies, whether we can obtain the FDA and other regulatory approvals required to market our products under development in the United States or abroad, whether the market will accept our products and services and whether we are successful in identifying, completing and integrating acquisitions, as well as other risk factors and business considerations described in the Company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings including the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statements in this document should be evaluated in light of these important risk factors. While we do not intend to directly harvest, manufacture, distribute or sell cannabis or cannabis products, we may be detrimentally affected by a change in enforcement by federal or state governments and we may be subject to additional risks in connection with the evolving regulatory area and associated uncertainties. Any such effects may give rise to risks and uncertainties that are currently unknown or amplify others mentioned herein. Although the Company believes the expectations reflected in its forward-looking statements are reasonable and are based on reasonable assumptions, no assurance can be given that these assumptions are accurate or that any of these expectations will be achieved (in full or at all) or will prove to have been correct. Moreover, such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those implied or expressed by the forward-looking statements. In addition, any forward-looking statements included in this press release represent the Company’s views only as of the date of its publication and should not be relied upon as representing its views as of any subsequent date. The Company assumes no obligation to correct or update these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Company Contact: Jaime Hinojosa, Chief Financial Officer, Astrotech Corporation, (512) 485-9530.
Tables follow | ||||||||
ASTROTECH CORPORATION Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (In thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited) |
||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2024 | 2023 | |||||||
Revenue | $ | 1,664 | $ | 750 | ||||
Cost of revenue | 913 | 444 | ||||||
Gross profit | 751 | 306 | ||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 7,241 | 5,775 | ||||||
Research and development | 6,790 | 5,591 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 14,031 | 11,366 | ||||||
Loss from operations | (13,280 | ) | (11,060 | ) | ||||
Other income and expense, net | 1,616 | 1,418 | ||||||
Loss from operations before income taxes | (11,664 | ) | (9,642 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense | (2 | ) | — | |||||
Net loss | $ | (11,666 | ) | $ | (9,642 | ) | ||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | ||||||||
Basic and diluted | 1,638 | 1,620 | ||||||
Basic and diluted net loss per common share: | ||||||||
Net loss per common share | $ | (7.12 | ) | $ | (5.95 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (11,666 | ) | $ | (9,642 | ) | ||
Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) | 276 | (254 | ) | |||||
Total comprehensive loss | $ | (11,390 | ) | $ | (9,896 | ) |
ASTROTECH CORPORATION Consolidated Balance Sheets (In thousands, except share and per share data) (Unaudited) |
||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2024 | 2023 | |||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10,442 | $ | 14,208 | ||||
Short-term investments | 21,474 | 27,919 | ||||||
Accounts receivable | 77 | 225 | ||||||
Inventory, net: | ||||||||
Raw materials | 2,038 | 1,379 | ||||||
Work-in-process | 66 | 243 | ||||||
Finished goods | 370 | 373 | ||||||
Income tax receivable | — | 1 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 261 | 365 | ||||||
Total current assets | 34,728 | 44,713 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 2,763 | 2,670 | ||||||
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net | 119 | 262 | ||||||
Other assets, net | 30 | 30 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 37,640 | $ | 47,675 | ||||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 373 | $ | 546 | ||||
Payroll related accruals | 1,174 | 633 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 754 | 1,170 | ||||||
Lease liabilities, current | 227 | 316 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 2,528 | 2,665 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities, net of current portion | 232 | — | ||||||
Lease liabilities, net of current portion | 73 | 291 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 2,833 | 2,956 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 2,500,000 shares authorized; 280,898 shares of Series D issued and outstanding at June 30, 2024 and 2023, respectively | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2024 and 2023 respectively; 1,712,045 and 1,692,045 shares issued at June 30, 2024 and 2023 respectively; 1,701,729 and 1,681,729 outstanding at June 30, 2024 and 2023, respectively | 190,643 | 190,643 | ||||||
Treasury shares, 10,316 shares at June 30, 2024 and 2023, respectively | (119 | ) | (119 | ) | ||||
Additional paid-in capital | 82,480 | 81,002 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (237,020 | ) | (225,354 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,177 | ) | (1,453 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 34,807 | 44,719 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 37,640 | $ | 47,675 |
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Three Mile Island nuclear plant could restart on Microsoft AI power deal
(Reuters) -Constellation Energy and Microsoft have signed a data center deal to help resurrect a unit of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania in what would be the first-ever restart of its kind, the companies said on Friday.
Big tech has led to a sudden surge in U.S. electricity demand for data-centers needed to expand technologies like artificial intelligence and cloud computing. Nuclear energy, which is nearly carbon-free and broadly considered more reliable than energy sources like solar and wind, has become a popular option for technology company’s with uninterrupted power needs and climate pledges.
“Nuclear plants are the only energy sources that can consistently deliver on that promise,” Constellation Chief Executive Officer Joe Dominguez said in a statement.
Constellation’s shares were up 14% in early trading and have risen more than 100% so far this year.
A relaunch of Three Mile Island, which had a separate unit suffer a partial-meltdown in 1979 in one of the biggest industrial accidents in the country’s history, still requires federal, state and local approvals.
The deal would help enable a revival of Unit 1 of the five-decades-old facility in Pennsylvania that was retired in 2019 due to economic reasons. Unit 2, which had the meltdown, will not be restarted.
Constellation plans to spend about $1.6 billion to revive the plant, which it expects to come online by 2028.
Reuters first reported on the potential restart in July.
Sources told Reuters at the time that Constellation hoped it would receive federal support for Three Mile Island that was similar to what was given to the Palisades Nuclear Generating Station, which received a $1.5 billion conditional loan for a relaunch from the administration of U.S. President Joe Biden.
Under the Constellation-Microsoft deal, Microsoft will purchase energy from the restarted plant for a period of 20 years. The Three Mile Island unit will provide 835 megawatts of energy to the tech giant.
A restart is expected to be challenging, but as power demand spikes, the virtually carbon-free electricity source is seeing renewed support from tech companies.
“This agreement is a major milestone in Microsoft’s efforts to help decarbonize the grid in support of our commitment to become carbon negative,” Bobby Hollis, vice president of energy at Microsoft, said in a statement.
Microsoft has also signed a power purchase agreement with Washington-state fusion company Helion, which says the plant will be online by 2028, far earlier than many scientists say fusion will become commercial.
Major tech executives, including ChatGPT developer OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, have touted nuclear energy as a solution to the growing power needs of data centers.
Altman has backed and is the chairman of nuclear power startup Oklo, which went public through a blank-check merger in May, while TerraPower – a startup Gates co-founded – broke ground on a nuclear facility in June.
Nuclear plants generated about 18.6% of the total electricity in the U.S. last year, according to Energy Information Administration data.
The power supply deals with A.I. data centers are also facing increased scrutiny. A similar deal between Talen Energy and Amazon signed earlier this year has been challenged by a group of electric utilities alleging it could spike costs for customers or hamper grid reliability.
Financial details of the Microsoft-Constellation deal were not disclosed. The companies declined to give more details on the agreement.
(Reporting by Laila Kearney in New York, Mrinalika Roy and Sourasis Bose in Bengaluru; additional reporting by Tim Gardner in Washington; Editing by Janane Venkatraman, Sriraj Kalluvila and Nick Zieminski)
3 Electric Vehicle (EV) Stocks That Could Go Parabolic
There’s no denying most electric vehicle (EV) stocks have been lackluster performers of late — the movement simply hasn’t caught on as it was expected to just a few years back. Indeed, sales trends and feedback suggest consumers are actually losing interest in EVs, citing range and charging concerns. And those worries aren’t invalid.
This doesn’t mean EV-related companies are a bust, however. There’s still a very bright future ahead. Bloomberg predicts sales of EVs will grow at an average yearly pace of 21% over the next four years, reaching annualized sales of 30 million cars en route to 73 million vehicles in 2040. The recent headwind is mostly just the result of fading euphoria before the industry clears the last of its marketability hurdles.
With that as the backdrop, here’s a rundown of three underestimated EV stocks that could go parabolic at some point in the foreseeable future. It’s no coincidence that all three companies are developing solutions that will allow EVs to live up to their initial expectations.
1. QuantumScape
If you’re familiar with the technology of EVs at all, then you likely know the lithium-based batteries they require are a stumbling block. They degrade over time and must be replaced every few years. Those replacement batteries are not cheap, priced anywhere from $5,000 to $20,000 apiece. They’re also difficult and expensive to recycle (and not every part of these lithium batteries can be reused).
What if, however, EV batteries’ biggest drawbacks were overcome? Enter QuantumScape (NYSE: QS).
In simplest terms, QuantumScape makes better lithium-based batteries. Using a proprietary technology, it has designed a ceramic solid-state lithium battery that not only doesn’t require anodes, but remains 95% efficient (in terms of energy-storage capacity) for far longer than the typical EV batteries currently in use do. Perhaps most notably, QuantumScape’s solid-state batteries offer markedly more driving range on a single charge.
A bit of due diligence on QuantumScape raises a red flag. That is, it hasn’t yet reported any revenue. Dig deeper, though. It’s coming. The company only began delivering prototype batteries for EV manufacturers to start tinkering with in March of this year, and these prototypes still aren’t the final version of the QSE-5 battery it intends to make en masse once the technology is finalized.
Interest in its batteries is firming up, though. In July Volkswagen‘s battery company PowerCo entered an agreement allowing the carmaker to manufacture EV batteries based on QuantumScape’s impressive tech. Other automobile makers are also likely eyeing this proprietary technology, since it has the potential to make their EVs more marketable as well.
The point is, QuantumScape’s first-ever revenue is on the horizon. That’s the sort of milestone that could light a fire under any stock.
2. Plug Power
While a better lithium-based battery could certainly give the EV industry a much-needed boost, that’s not the only way to power an automobile (aside from the current conventional, pollution-creating combustion engine). Hydrogen fuel cells can generate direct electric current that spins an electric motor too. In fact, a company called Plug Power (NASDAQ: PLUG) has already proven the idea works in automobiles.
The science is simple enough. A fuel cell’s cathode and anode chemically split a hydrogen molecule into positively and negatively charged protons and electrons, essentially becoming a battery in and of itself. And the only output from this process is heat and water.
This idea’s biggest hurdle to date has arguably been the world’s lack of understanding of it. Most everyone knows how well-proven combustion engines work, and battery-powered EVs are simple enough. But using hydrogen to create electricity? That’s a bit of a leap. There’s also the not-so-small issue of raw hydrogen not being readily available everywhere vehicles are driven.
As is always the case, though, time takes care of smart ideas. A few dozen consumer-facing hydrogen refueling stations are now up and running (mostly in California) plus many more private ones for bus and delivery-truck fleet operators.
So far Plug Power’s focus has been on everything but passenger vehicles. Large trucks and buses, industrial robotics, and aerial drones are where it’s making its biggest impact. It also provides stationary fuel cell systems that can power buildings, data centers, and factories in a pinch, or even on a permanent basis now that hydrogen is available — and in some cases cheaper than more mainstream methods of procuring electricity.
Wherever this technology’s growth awaits, Plug Power stands ready.
As for investors, they should know that this company’s revenue has been inconsistent. The company is also habitually unprofitable, with losses growing rather than shrinking. Plug Power may be at a fiscal turning point, though. Analysts are calling for a strong reversal of this year’s top-line lull, putting the company on a sustained path toward profitability. As is the case with QuantumScape, simply being on the right fiscal trajectory could be enough to reignite the stock following its three-year lull.
This might help: As of the latest look, analysts’ consensus price target of $4.06 per share is nearly twice Plug Power stock’s present price.
3. Nikola
And if you’re looking for practical, commercial uses of hydrogen fuel cells as a power source for conventional vehicles, look no further than Nikola (NASDAQ: NKLA).
You won’t be driving a Nikola vehicle anytime soon. In fact, you probably won’t be driving one at all. The company’s production is limited to class-8 trucks; you know them better as “big rigs” (the tractor part of a tractor-semitrailer). While the company makes a purely battery-powered rechargeable truck, following problems with these battery-powered haulers that forced a sweeping recall, it’s becoming clearer to the company — as well as its customers — that fuel cell-powered electric vehicles are actually the more cost-effective and reliable option. To this end, Nikola delivered 72 of these tractors in the second quarter of this year, up 80% from Q1’s figure.
The tech lends itself to this sort of heavy-duty industrial usage, anyway.
While hydrogen fuel cells are a proven means of generating clean electricity, they’re still not quite practical for the mass market, which of course requires lots of refueling infrastructure. (For perspective, there are nearly 200,000 gas stations in the U.S. alone.)
Class-8 truck fleet operators don’t necessarily need such a widely available network of refueling options, however. They often manage their own, allowing their drivers to fuel up at warehouses or dispatch centers rather than getting them tied up in traffic. Nikola is supporting the paradigm shift on this end of the business as well, launching a venture called Hyla early this year to offer refueling solutions for its hydrogen-powered class-8 rigs.
Like Plug Power and QuantumScape, Nikola is presently unprofitable. Founder Trevor Milton brought legal trouble to the table as well but is no longer involved with the company.
Look forward rather than backward, though. This company’s top line is projected to grow more than 200% this year and then repeat the feat next year as fleet owners clamor for its long-awaited solution. This will at least drive the company toward profitability.
That will still only scratch the surface of its opportunity, however. Roughly a quarter of a million of these big trucks are sold every year in the U.S. alone. More and more of them are zero-emissions vehicles that comply with continually rising emissions standards.
Should you invest $1,000 in Nikola right now?
Before you buy stock in Nikola, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nikola wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $694,743!*
Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month. The Stock Advisor service has more than quadrupled the return of S&P 500 since 2002*.
*Stock Advisor returns as of September 16, 2024
James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Volkswagen. The Motley Fool recommends Volkswagen Ag. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
3 Electric Vehicle (EV) Stocks That Could Go Parabolic was originally published by The Motley Fool
Jones Walker Boosts Corporate Practice Group with Seven Lateral Hires
Former Fishman Haygood Corporate Attorneys Expand M&A and Private Equity, Real Estate, and Finance Experience
NEW ORLEANS, Sept. 19, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — Jones Walker LLP is pleased to welcome three new partners, John Werner, Chip Saulsbury, and Tyler Marquette, and four new associates, Meghan Montgomery, Tyler Andrews, Anne McAloon, and Michael Stewart, as members of the Corporate Practice Group in the New Orleans office. Meghan will be admitted to the firm’s partnership in January 2025.
“We are thrilled to welcome this distinguished group of attorneys to Jones Walker,” said Bill Hines, managing partner. “The addition of three highly regarded partners and four exceptional associates underscores our commitment to providing topflight legal services. Their tremendous client list and esteemed reputation align perfectly with our mission to deliver excellence to our clients. Our corporate team’s capabilities are now unmatched in the region. We look forward to the valuable contributions they will undoubtedly bring to our firm.”
The corporate team joining from Fishman Haygood brings well-established practices from a firm with a rich history of serving the New Orleans and Louisiana business community.
Reflecting on the decision to join Jones Walker, John stated, “This is a remarkable opportunity for us to join a firm that we have always admired and respected. We have worked with and have close relationships with many Jones Walker attorneys, so we have experienced firsthand why they are respected not just regionally, but across the country.” He added, “We look forward to building our corporate practice through the firm’s platform and expanding the scope of services we provide to our client base.”
About John Werner
John is an accomplished corporate attorney who focuses on financings, including mergers and acquisitions, private equity transactions, and general corporate advice. He represents numerous private equity funded portfolio companies in their ongoing corporate needs and several family offices regarding their investments in private companies. John was the former managing partner and a member of the management committee at Fishman Haygood.
About Chip Saulsbury
Chip is an experienced corporate professional who focuses his practice on mergers and acquisitions, private equity, corporate finance, and general corporate matters. He frequently represents private equity funds in acquisitions of portfolio companies, add-on acquisitions, other direct equity and debt investments, and exits or divestitures from these various investments, as well as family investment offices and individuals in investments in private equity funds, hedge funds, and other direct investment activity. Chip also advises family and closely held businesses in transitioning ownership and management to the next generation or in sales to third parties. In his finance practice, Chip represents borrowers in acquisition financings, syndicated credit facilities, credit-tenant lease financings, and other secured credit facilities.
About Tyler Marquette
Tyler is a seasoned commercial real estate attorney whose practice includes development, construction, acquisitions and sales, financing, and leasing. He represents national and regional developers and investors in the acquisition, development, and financing of retail, industrial, hospitality, and multifamily properties across the country. Tyler is also a licensed title insurance producer in Louisiana and Mississippi.
About Meghan Montgomery
Meghan is a corporate attorney who focuses her practice on mergers and acquisitions, private equity investments, capital raises, joint ventures, and general corporate matters. She frequently represents private equity funds in acquisitions of portfolio companies, add-on acquisitions, other direct equity and debt investments, and exits or divestitures from these various investments. In addition to her transactional work, Meghan also advises senior management, investment funds, family offices, and boards on general strategic, governance, and corporate matters.
About Tyler Andrews
Tyler is a finance attorney who advises clients in connection with corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, and private equity transactions. Prior to joining Jones Walker, he practiced at a boutique New Orleans law firm and in the Houston office of an international law firm, where he assisted clients with a broad range of complex corporate matters in the energy industry.
About Anne McAloon
Anne practices primarily in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, private equity, and general corporate matters. Prior to joining Jones Walker, she advised on transactions and corporate law matters at a boutique New Orleans law firm and in the Baton Rouge office of a regional law firm, where she assisted a variety of clients in general contract negotiation.
About Michael Stewart
Michael is a real estate attorney whose practice includes acquisitions and sales, private equity investments, corporate financing, and other general business matters. He assists clients with structuring, negotiating, and closing commercial transactions. Michael has experience managing numerous leases of retail, industrial, and office sites on behalf of both local and national landlords and tenants, including ground leases, build-to-suit leases, reverse build-to-suit leases, subleases, and master leases.
About Jones Walker
Jones Walker LLP (joneswalker.com) is among the largest 145 law firms in the United States. With offices in Alabama, Arizona, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, New York, and Texas, we serve local, regional, national, and international business interests. The firm is committed to providing a comprehensive range of legal services to major multinational public and private corporations, Fortune® 500 companies, money center banks, worldwide insurers, and emerging companies doing business in the United States and abroad.
Contact:
Ryan Evans
504.582.8209
revans@joneswalker.com
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/jones-walker-boosts-corporate-practice-group-with-seven-lateral-hires-302253634.html
SOURCE Jones Walker LLP
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Trump Media plummets to new low on the first trading day the former president can sell his shares
Shares of Trump Media & Technology Group slumped to their lowest level ever at the opening bell Friday, the first trading day that its biggest shareholder, former President Donald Trump, is free to sell his stake in the company behind the Truth Social platform.
Shares of Trump Media, commonly called TMTG, tumbled almost 7% to $13.73, putting the value of the company at less than $3 billion. Trump owns more than half of it.
Trump and other insiders in the company have been unable to cash in on the highly volatile stock due standard lock-up agreements that prevent big stakeholders from selling stakes for a set period after a company becomes publicly traded. TMTG began trading publicly in March.
Trump owns nearly 115 million shares of the company, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on TMTG’s share price early Friday, Trump’s holdings are worth, at least on paper, about $1.6 billion. It’s usually not in the best interest of big stakeholders to even attempt to sell large tranches of their stock because it could risk a broader sell-off.
Since going public, shares in Trump Media have gyrated wildly, often depending on news related to Trump, the Republican presidential nominee.
One week ago, the company’s shares jumped nearly 12% after Trump said he wouldn’t sell shares when the lock-up period lifted. The stock dipped more than 10% following the debate earlier this month between Trump and the Democrats’ nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris. In mid-July, shares climbed more than 31% in the first day of trading following the first assassination attempt on Trump.
Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. is now worth considerably less than several months ago. When the company made its debut on the Nasdaq in March, shares hit a high of $79.38.
Truth Social came into existence after he was banned from Twitter and Facebook following the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Based in Sarasota, Florida, Trump Media has been losing money and struggling to raise revenue. It lost nearly $58.2 million last year while generating only $4.1 million in revenue, according to regulatory filings.
Investment advisers urge clients away from cash after Fed rate cut
By Suzanne McGee and Carolina Mandl
(Reuters) -Investment advisers are urging clients to dump hefty cash allocations now that the Federal Reserve has begun its much-anticipated interest-rate easing, a process they expect to limit the appeal of money-market funds in the coming months.
Retail investors’ assets in money market funds have grown by $951 billion since 2022, when the Fed started its rate-hiking cycle to tame inflation, according to the Investment Company Institute, which represents investment funds. Their assets stood at $2.6 trillion on Sept. 18, roughly 80% higher than at the beginning of 2022. Total money market assets stood at $6.3 trillion.
“As investors are now more convinced that the Fed will reduce rates in line with its guidance, investors will likely grasp for yields that will not dwindle overnight,” said Hannes Hofmann, head of family office group at Citi Private Bank, adding appetite for risk is likely to increase.
On Wednesday, the U.S. central bank cut the federal funds rate by a larger-than-usual 50 basis points to a range of 4.75% to 5%, which makes holding cash in deposit accounts and cash-like instruments less appealing.
“You’re going to have to shift everything … further up in the amount of risk you’re accepting,” said Jason Britton, Charleston-based founder of Reflection Asset Management, who manages or oversees around $5 billion in assets. “Money-market assets will have to become fixed-income holdings; fixed income will move into preferred stocks or dividend-paying stocks.”
Money-market funds – ultra low-risk mutual funds that invest in short-term Treasury securities and other cash proxies – are a way to gauge investor interest in the nearly risk-free returns they offer. When short-term interest rates climb, money-market returns rise with them, increasing their appeal to investors.
“Investors may need to look at something different, or longer-term, to lock in rates and not be as exposed to the Fed lowering interest rates,” said Ross Mayfield, investment strategist at Baird Wealth.
Some investors could end up transferring funds from money market funds to equities, advisers say. Daniel Morris, Chief Market Strategist, BNP Paribas Asset Management, said the appeal of money market funds will wane. Morris said he sees better opportunity in equities and is slightly overweight equities versus fixed income.
Carol Schleif, chief investment officer of BMO Family Office, expects investors to keep some cash on the sidelines to wait for opportunities to buy stocks.
It could take a while for initial reactions to the Fed’s decision on Wednesday to show up in money-market fund flows, as it has been tough to persuade retail investors to abandon their cash holdings, analysts note. Assets in money market funds tend to peak nine months after the first rate cut, BofA Securities said in a report.
“If people see a broader-based advance in stocks, they may move out of cash more quickly, as that would point to owning riskier assets as a good thing,” said Christian Salomone, chief investment officer of Ballast Rock Private Wealth.
Investors “are stuck between a rock and a hard place,” Britton said, faced with a choice between investing in riskier assets or earning a smaller return from cash-like products.
(Reporting by Suzanne McGee and Carolina Mandl; additional reporting by Davide Barbuscia; editing by Megan Davies, Rod Nickel and Nick Zieminski)
Mortgage Rates Drop, But Homebuyers Still Say 'No Thanks'– Here's What's Really Behind The Buyer Strike
The recent drop in mortgage rates hasn’t sparked the homebuying surge many industry experts anticipated. Instead, potential buyers are holding firm, contributing to what some analysts are calling a “buyer strike” in the housing market.
Nick Gerli, CEO of Reventure Consulting, has been monitoring the trend. In a recent YouTube poll conducted by Gerli, an overwhelming 91% of 5,000 respondents indicated that lower mortgage rates wouldn’t increase their likelihood of purchasing a home.
Don’t Miss:
Gerli noted that sentiment is echoed in broader market data. The University of Michigan’s survey on homebuying sentiment reached a record low in July, with 87% of Americans saying it’s a bad time to buy a home. The figure surpasses the pessimism seen during the early 1980s when mortgage rates peaked at 18%.
Trending: Elon Musk’s secret mansion in Austin revealed through court filings. Here’s how to invest in the city’s growth before prices go back up.
“We’re dealing with unprecedented negative sentiment around the housing market,” Gerli said on X (formerly Twitter) last week. He noted that the long-term average of those viewing it as a bad time to buy is typically around 31%.
The reluctance of buyers persists despite the median U.S. monthly housing payment falling to $2,558, a 1.3% decrease from last year, according to recent data from Redfin.
Central to the standoff is the issue of home prices. The median U.S. home sale price stands at $388,085, up 3.7% from the previous year and just below the all-time high set in July, Redfin noted. That price resilience, partly due to limited inventory, has created a deadlock between buyers and sellers.
Trending: Warren Buffett once said, “If you don’t find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die.” These high-yield real estate notes that pay 7.5% – 9% make earning passive income easier than ever.
Gerli points to historical data showing that the current market represents the largest housing bubble in 134 years when adjusting for inflation. “From 1890 to 1990, inflation-adjusted home prices never breached more than 20% above the long-term norm,” Gerli explained. “Everything changed in the 2000s. What changed was Federal Reserve manipulation of interest rates and money printing.”
Years of low interest rates and quantitative easing following the 2008 financial crisis and the pandemic created conditions for home prices to surge. Now, with monetary tightening having been in effect for some time, the market is paying for it, Gerli said.
See Also: This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to become a landlord in just 10 minutes, and you only need $100.
Sellers are sitting on substantial equity – an estimated $32 trillion as of 2024, more than double the peak of the 2006 bubble, the Reventure CEO said. That cushion has made many reluctant to lower prices. Buyers, on the other hand, view current valuations as inflated and unsustainable.
Trending: Commercial real estate has historically outperformed the stock market, and this platform allows individuals to invest in commercial real estate with as little as $5,000 offering a 12% target yield with a bonus 1% return boost today!
The possibility of a recession adds another layer of uncertainty. A sharp rise in unemployment could trigger forced selling and potentially lead to substantial price declines. Gerli highlighted the historical correlation between unemployment rates and mortgage defaults, suggesting a potential increase in housing inventory that many economists may be overlooking.
It’s “easier for sellers to simply give up equity, prices to drop 20% and the market to rebalance,” Gerli said. However, he acknowledged that seller psychology makes such a straightforward resolution unlikely in the short term.
For now, the housing market remains in a state of tension, with traditional models struggling to predict its next move.
Read Next:
Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge’s one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today’s competitive market.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
This article Mortgage Rates Drop, But Homebuyers Still Say ‘No Thanks’– Here’s What’s Really Behind The Buyer Strike originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Why Are CrowdStrike (CRWD) Shares Soaring Today
What Happened:
Shares of cybersecurity company CrowdStrike (NASDAQ:CRWD) jumped 5.9% in the morning session as markets roared back after an initially muted response to the Fed’s rate cut, which sparked a renewed appetite for risk assets. While investors were expecting a reduction in rates from the US central bank, there was a bit of back and forth on whether the cut would be 25bps (a quarter percent) or 50bps (half a percent).
The Fed ended up slashing its policy rate by 50bps (0.5%) to 4.75%-5.00%. This marks the first rate reduction in roughly four years. As a reminder, the Fed—under Chair Jerome Powell—began raising rates to tackle inflation coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic when a confluence of supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, and stimulus spending caused inflation to run hot.
Looking forward, the Fed signaled that more cuts are possible in 2024/25. Putting it all together, the announcement and outlook provided a breath of fresh air and a clearer view of the Fed’s monetary policy stance, which the market has been waiting for with bated breath. If there’s anything the market doesn’t like, it’s uncertainty.
The driver of a stock’s value is the sum of its future cash flows discounted back to today. The result of lower interest rates, all else equal, is higher stock valuations. This is especially true for higher-growth stocks such as those in the technology sector, where the current value depends more on cash flows many years out in the future.
As a reminder, a software update on the company’s Falcon platform was the culprit behind a global outage in July 2024 that canceled flights, made hospital appointments vanish, and prevented TV broadcasters from going on air to talk about the outage. The stock fell precipitously afterward as the market debated whether the flawed update and ensuring outage would cause irreparable harm to the company and its brand. Thus far, it seems like the damage has been limited. Still, the market is trying to figure out the right price for this asset, which is a leader in its space, growing quickly and profitable, but not immune to hiccups.
Is now the time to buy CrowdStrike? Access our full analysis report here, it’s free.
What is the market telling us:
CrowdStrike’s shares are very volatile and over the last year have had 14 moves greater than 5%. In context of that, today’s move is indicating the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business.
The previous big move we wrote about was 21 days ago, when the stock gained 5.8% on the news that the company reported second-quarter earnings results. The quarter itself was solid, with ARR (annual recurring revenue), revenue, and operating profit all beating. With the stock going from nearly $380 in mid-July to $265 due to the massive outage from a flawed CrowdStrike Falcon update on Windows machines that wreaked havoc on airlines, hospitals, and other important parts of the global economy, the market feared that numbers could look quite bad in the near-term. Interestingly, the company provided positive updates. These include 1) Multiple large deals (7-, 8-, and even a 9-figure deal) closed after the incident; 2) Gross retention rates over the trailing 5 weeks up year on year; and 3) The CNAPP (Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform), SIEM (Security information and event management), and identity modules collectively surpassed $1B ARR.
Moving on, guidance was underwhelming, though, as full-year revenue was lowered and revenue guidance for next quarter missed Wall Street’s estimates. However, this seems ‘better than feared. These results prove that while there are headwinds from the outage, the headwinds aren’t so bad (for the time being).
CrowdStrike is up 14.8% since the beginning of the year, but at $283.82 per share it is still trading 27.6% below its 52-week high of $392.15 from June 2024. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of CrowdStrike’s shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $4,119.
Unless you’ve been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefitting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story.
Huawei's $2,800 Tri-Fold Mate XT Sparks Frustration As Limited Stock Fails To Meet Demand
Ahead of the highly anticipated launch, Huawei Technologies‘ new $2,800 tri-fold smartphone, the Mate XT, has hit the market, but many eager buyers were left disappointed due to limited availability.
What Happened: Huawei and Apple Inc. AAPL launched their latest smartphones in China on Friday. However, many Huawei fans were disappointed as the $2,800 Mate XT was only available for pre-order customers, Reuters reported.
At Huawei’s flagship store in Shenzhen, “super fans” expressed frustration after learning that only confirmed pre-orders could purchase the new tri-foldable Mate XT. A university student surnamed Ye, who had been waiting since 10 p.m. the previous night, said, “They should have made it clear we can’t buy.”
Similar scenes unfolded at Huawei’s Wangfujing store in Beijing, where access to the Mate XT was also limited to pre-order customers. Reuters reported around 30 people queuing outside the Beijing store and a similar number in Shenzhen early on Friday.
Subscribe to the Benzinga Tech Trends newsletter to get all the latest tech developments delivered to your inbox.
Analysts had previously warned that supply chain constraints might leave many potential buyers empty-handed. Huawei executive director Richard Yu stated that sales were “better than expected” and the company was working to expand capacity. However, the exact number of phones produced or delivered on launch day remains undisclosed.
Pre-orders for the Mate XT have exceeded 6.5 million, nearly double the foldable smartphones shipped worldwide in the second quarter of this year, according to IDC. Despite the high demand, production constraints are causing significant delays.
Why It Matters: Huawei’s latest tri-fold smartphone, the Mate XT, has been generating significant buzz even before its official release. On Tuesday, it was reported that the Mate XT was being listed for over $7,000 on online marketplaces, more than double its list price, highlighting the high demand and limited availability.
The launch of the Mate XT comes amid Huawei’s ongoing efforts to challenge Apple’s dominance in the Chinese smartphone market. The Mate XT, priced at $2,800, is significantly more expensive than Apple’s iPhone 16 Pro Max, which starts at $1,199 for 256 GB storage.
Huawei’s strategic timing for the Mate XT’s launch also plays a crucial role. Huawei scheduled its product launch event on the same day as Apple’s iPhone 16 reveal, aiming to capture consumer attention and market share.
Furthermore, Huawei’s focus on using more components from Chinese suppliers, as seen in its Pura 70 series, reflects its commitment to tech self-sufficiency. A teardown analysis revealed that the Pura 70 series incorporated more homemade parts, showcasing Huawei’s resilience amid U.S. sanctions.
Check out more of Benzinga’s Consumer Tech coverage by following this link.
Read Next:
Photo courtesy: Huawei
This story was generated using Benzinga Neuro and edited by Kaustubh Bagalkote
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.