The Stock Market Is Soaring but These 2 Stocks Are Still Dirt Cheap Buys
Earlier this month, the S&P 500 hit a record high of more than 6,000 for the first time ever. Based on that, you might assume that stocks may be too expensive to buy right now as the average stock in the index is trading at more than 25 times earnings. However, there are still many deals out there.
Two stocks that could be among the best bargains right now include AbbVie (NYSE: ABBV) and Comcast (NASDAQ: CMCSA).
Are You Missing The Morning Scoop? Wake up with Breakfast news in your inbox every market day. Sign Up For Free »
Drugmaker AbbVie isn’t having a great year, but it’s not having a bad one, either. Its year-to-date gains totaled a modest 7% as of Monday’s close. That’s decent, but it’s nowhere near the S&P 500’s more impressive 23% rally.
For a while, the stock was outperforming the broad index. However, things went sideways for AbbVie recently after the company reported last week that its schizophrenia drug, emraclidine, failed to meet its primary endpoint in a phase 2 clinical trial. Emraclidine seems to have had the potential to be a blockbuster drug for AbbVie, and investors didn’t take the news lightly, dumping the stock afterward.
For a diverse business like AbbVie, that is by no means crippling to its operations or long-term outlook. In its most recent quarter, for the period ending Sept. 30, the company reported $14.5 billion in revenue, which grew by nearly 4% year over year — and that includes a 37% decline in Humira, which recently lost patent protection. AbbVie’s diverse business spans immunology, oncology, aesthetics, neuroscience, and eye care.
Yet, investors generally recognize that the company is no pushover. Abbvie has historically proven itself to be a growing business. While the pharmaceutical business is inherently risky, and failures will probably show up in Abbvie’s pipeline of drug therapies, that itself isn’t a reason to turn bearish on what’s still a top stock to buy and hold. Eventually, the risk-reward profile is too good to ignore.
AbbVie is facing a slowdown right now but the company expects that in 2025 it will “return to robust growth” and that through until the end of the decade, it will grow by high-single digits per year. And while Humira has lost patent protection, the company has effectively replaced that revenue with Skyrizi and Rinvoq, two immunology drugs which it believes will combine for higher peak revenue than its popular rheumatoid arthritis treatment.
For investors looking to play the long game, this sell-off can be an opportune time to buy AbbVie on weakness as it trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of 14, which looks dirt cheap for such a great growth stock.
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. Announcement: If You Have Suffered Losses in e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (NYSE: ELF), You Are Encouraged to Contact The Rosen Law Firm About Your Rights
NEW YORK, Nov. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —
WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces an investigation of potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. ELF resulting from allegations that e.l.f. Beauty may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.
SO WHAT: If you purchased e.l.f. Beauty securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=31380 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email case@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.
WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On November 20, 2024, Muddy Waters Research issued a report in which it announced that it had a short position in e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. Muddy Waters stated that it believed that e.l.f. Beauty had “materially overstated revenue over the past three quarters,” and that it believed that in “Q2 FY24, ELF management realized its growth narrative was in trouble as its inventory built. It appears that ELF then began reporting inflated revenue and profits. Its reported inventory also appears materially inflated as a result – i.e., to account for cash that has not really come in.”
On this news, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. stock fell as much as 15% in intraday trading on November 20, 2024.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
——————————-
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
case@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Divorcing at 55 With $800K in My 401(k) – How Do I Protect My Finances?
SmartAsset and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below.
Like all family and property law, divorce is a highly state-specific process. How you will handle a divorce and protect your assets, and what constitutes individual vs. shared assets, will depend entirely on your jurisdiction. As a result, how retirement accounts are treated during divorce proceeds can vary widely from state to state.
The first step is typically to separate personal from marital assets. In most cases, you retain assets and debts that predated the marriage, and you split assets and debts that you acquired while you were married. This is far more complicated than it sounds, as it’s very easy for assets to comingle and share accrued value during the course of a marriage.
For example, say that you are 55 years old with $800,000 in a 401(k). The most important part of this will be where you live and how much of the account was earned during the marriage. From there, a divorce court will typically divide up the 401(k) based on your household’s overall assets and, in particular, any other retirement accounts held by you or your spouse.
While a complete discussion of this issue is far beyond the scope of a single article, we’ll explore some of the most important factors to consider below.
If you need financial advice during or after a divorce, consider connecting with a fiduciary financial advisor today.
Divorce courts typically do not give special status to a couple’s tax-advantaged retirement accounts. A judge will treat these portfolios as a standard financial asset, splitting up each account based on the overall distribution of assets, the parties’ relative financial status and an account’s marital vs. personal status, among other factors.
There is no tax penalty for taking early withdrawals in order to transfer retirement assets between divorcing spouses. This is typically done through a “Qualified Domestic Relations Order” or a “Transfer Incident to Divorce” depending on the nature of the account.
You can move these funds directly into another qualifying pre-tax account without triggering income taxes or an early withdrawal penalty.
For example, say that you have $800,000 in a 401(k), of which you had $300,000 in the account when you got married. Typically, you will keep that $300,000. The remaining $500,000 might be considered a marital asset and be distributed between you and your spouse. You might then agree to split that money 50/50, and draft a QDRO to remove $250,000 worth of assets from your 401(k) and move them to an account of your spouse’s choosing.
This Dividend King Is on Track to Join the $1 Trillion Club. Is It a Buy?
There are currently eight publicly traded companies with market caps of $1 trillion or more: Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Tesla, and Berkshire Hathaway.
Those stocks are highly renowned, and for good reason: They have made plenty of investors wealthy. However, none of them are particularly known as dividend stocks, and thus far the trillion-dollar club has excluded longtime dividend payers. However, that could soon change.
Start Your Mornings Smarter! Wake up with Breakfast news in your inbox every market day. Sign Up For Free »
Walmart (NYSE: WMT), the world’s biggest retailer and the largest company in the world by revenue, has quietly blown away the rest of the retail sector in recent years as its commitment to omnichannel sales and reputation for everyday low prices have delivered steady growth. Meanwhile, many of its peers have struggled with inflation and weak consumer spending.
Walmart reported another round of strong quarterly results on Tuesday morning. Top-line growth was strong across the board with comparable-store sales (comps) up 5.3% at U.S. stores (excluding fuel), its best performance in at least five quarters. And Sam’s Club, its members-only warehouse retail chain, reported 7% comps growth excluding fuel.
At its international segment, which has historically been a challenging segment for the company, constant-currency revenue rose 12.4% to $30.3 billion. Overall, revenue was up 5.5% to $169.6 billion, which topped the consensus at $166.6 billion.
The retailer also delivered solid margin improvement, with gross margin increasing 21 basis points to 24.2%, driven by lower markdowns in U.S. stores and strong inventory management. Overall operating margin expanded as well, as operating income was up 8.2% to $6.7 billion. Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) rose from $0.51 to $0.58, ahead of the consensus at $0.53.
Walmart’s stores performed well, but it’s also benefiting from emerging growth businesses like advertising, where revenue jumped 28%, and global e-commerce remains strong with sales up 27% as it gains market share on Amazon and other competitors.
The company also raised its guidance, showing increased confidence in the holiday quarter. It now expects net sales to rise 4.8% to 5.1% and full-year adjusted EPS of $2.42 to $2.47.
Walmart’s market cap topped $700 billion for the first time on Tuesday, Nov. 19, meaning the company is approaching a $1 trillion market cap. At its current valuation, the stock would only have to grow by 43%, which seems achievable given its recent momentum. The stock is now up 66% year to date, though it will be difficult to repeat that performance next year.
ROSEN, A TOP-RANKED LAW FIRM, Encourages Xiao-I Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – AIXI
NEW YORK, Nov. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —
WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of Xiao-I Corporation AIXI: (i) American depository shares (“ADSs”) pursuant and/or traceable to the Offering Documents issued in connection with the Company’s initial public offering conducted on or about March 9, 2023 (the “IPO” or “Offering”); and/or (ii) securities between March 9, 2023 and July 12, 2024, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important December 16, 2024 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Xiao-I ADSs pursuant and/or traceable to the IPO and/or securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Xiao-I class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=25023 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email case@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than December 16, 2024. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, the Offering Documents and defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) defendants had downplayed the true scope and severity of risks that Xiao-I faced due to certain of its Chinese shareholders’ non-compliance with Circular 37 Registration, which imposes certain registration requirements on Chinese residents that contribute domestic assets or interests to offshore companies, including Xiao-I’s inability to use Offering proceeds for intended business purposes; (2) Xiao-I failed to comply with the U.S.’s Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) in preparing its financial statements; (3) defendants overstated Xiao-I’s efforts to remediate material weaknesses in Xiao-I’s financial controls; (4) Xiao-I was forced to incur significant research and development (“R&D”) expenses to effectively compete in the AI industry; (5) Xiao-I downplayed the significant negative impact that such expenses would have on Xiao-I’s business and financial results; (6) accordingly, Xiao-I overstated its AI capabilities, R&D resources, and overall ability to compete in the AI market; (7) as a result of all the foregoing, there was a substantial likelihood that Xiao-I would fail to comply with NASDAQ’s listing requirements, including, inter alia, that its ADSs maintain a minimum closing bid price of $1.00 per share, (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”); and (8) as a result, the Offering Documents and defendants’ public statements throughout the Class Period were materially false and/or misleading and failed to state information required to be stated therein. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Xiao-I class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=25023 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email case@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
case@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
The Top S&P 500 Stock of 2024 (So Far) Isn't Nvidia. Here's Where History Says the Soaring Stock Is Headed in 2025.
On Nov. 20, Nvidia reported financial results for its fiscal 2025 third quarter, showing stunning 94% year-over-year revenue growth. The business is absolutely booming, and so is the stock price. As of this writing, Nvidia stock is up close to 200% year to date.
As impressive as those returns are for Nvidia, it’s not the best-performing stock in the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) this year. That distinction presently belongs to energy company Vistra (NYSE: VST), which has gained 332% in 2024.
Start Your Mornings Smarter! Wake up with Breakfast news in your inbox every market day. Sign Up For Free »
Vistra provides residential electricity and owns power generation plants, including nuclear plants. And many investors believe that its nuclear assets set it up to meet the growing power needs of artificial intelligence (AI).
However, after gaining over 300% in under a year, is it too late to buy Vistra stock? Stock market history can serve as a guide.
Looking at top stocks from the past can offer some useful insights. For practical reasons, I had to limit the scope of this survey by setting some parameters.
First, I’m only looking at the last 10 years for the S&P 500. Second, I’ve only included stocks that were members of the S&P 500 for the entire year. Companies included in the index during the year were excluded from the results.
Over the last 10 years, Southwest Airlines, Netflix, Nvidia, Align Technology, AMD, Devon Energy, and Occidental Petroleum have all taken the top-stock crown at least once.
Year |
Best-Performing Stock |
Return When It Was the Top Stock |
Return the Following Year |
---|---|---|---|
2014 |
Southwest Airlines |
125% |
2% |
2015 |
Netflix |
134% |
8% |
2016 |
Nvidia |
224% |
81% |
2017 |
Align Technology |
131% |
(6%) |
2018 |
AMD |
80% |
148% |
2019 |
AMD |
148% |
100% |
2020 |
Nvidia |
122% |
125% |
2021 |
Devon Energy |
179% |
40% |
2022 |
Occidental Petroleum |
117% |
(5%) |
2023 |
Nvidia |
239% |
196%* |
Return data from YCharts. Table by author. *Year-to-date return as of 11/21/24.
This data is actually quite surprising. After being the index’s top stock, one would think it would be due for a pullback. But in reality, the past decade’s annual best performers continued their winning streak the next year in eight out of 10 cases.
Moreover, the average gain in the second year was huge. Investors could have made a lot of money by simply buying whichever was the best stock in the past year.
Let’s say an investor bought Southwest Airlines stock on Dec. 31, 2014 and held for all of 2015. And let’s say that this investor sold Southwest Airlines at the end of 2015 and rolled that investment into Netflix for 2016, then did the same for Nvidia in 2017, and so on.
7 Examples of Financial Advisor Branding Statements
Cultivating a personal brand can help advisors stand out in a competitive landscape. The most successful businesses understand the value of a highly recognizable, trusted brand image for attracting new clients. An impactful financial advisor branding statement can help you clearly convey what your business stands for and the value you offer to prospective clients.
Do you need help expanding the marketing of your financial advisor practice? Try SmartAsset AMP, a holistic client prospecting and marketing automation platform.
A branding statement is a concise statement that neatly encapsulates who you are, what you do and what makes your business unique. A well-crafted branding statement conveys your firm’s mission, values and key selling points.
Financial advisors may develop a branding statement that represents their firm as a whole. They could also write a separate personal branding statement for themselves.
Your firm’s branding statement communicates what your business does and how you meet your clients’ needs. A personal brand statement is an opportunity to demonstrate your personality and what you’re most passionate about when it comes to helping clients.
Financial services is a highly competitive industry. If you want to succeed, you have to give prospective clients clear reasons to choose your business over another advisor’s. A branding statement helps you to crystallize your messaging for maximum impact.
Developing a brand statement allows you to:
-
Emphasize your expertise to your target audience
-
Put your skills and unique value proposition in the spotlight
-
Demonstrate the value you offer to your clients
The best brand statements for advisors are memorable or “sticky,” meaning their message lingers with prospective clients. Stickiness is an important characteristic in building your advisor brand, as prospects who remember you may be more likely to seek out your services.
It’s important to remember that a brand statement is different from a slogan or tagline. Brand statements are concise, but still detailed. Meanwhile a slogan or tagline is usually a catchy phrase that’s designed to grab attention.
SmartAsset and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below.
A branding statement is typically brief, no more than one to three sentences. So it’s important to choose your words carefully. Having some examples of financial advisor branding statements to follow can help you decide what to include:
Meet the Newest Stock-Split Stock in the Dow Jones. It Has Soared 910% Since Early Last Year, and It's Still a Buy Right Now, According to Wall Street
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is the oldest stock market index in the U.S. It is a price-weighted index that tracks the performance of 30 of the largest publicly traded companies in the country. Its member companies span a variety of sectors and industries, and it is considered by many to be a reliable indicator of stock market performance and the health of the overall economy. There are only a few broad criteria for a company’s inclusion:
-
Be incorporated and headquartered in the U.S.
-
Have the largest percentage of revenue derived from the U.S.
-
Be a member of the S&P 500.
-
Be a non-transportation or non-utility company.
-
Because it’s price-weighted, the highest-priced stock should be no more than 10 times that of the lowest-priced stock in the index.
-
The company must have “an excellent reputation, demonstrate sustained growth, and is of interest to a large number of investors,” according to S&P Global.
Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) is the most recent addition to the Dow Jones, joining the benchmark on Nov. 8 and replacing chipmaker Intel. That makes it one of only three companies to make the cut so far this year.
Are You Missing The Morning Scoop? Breakfast News delivers it all in a quick, Foolish, and free daily newsletter. Sign Up For Free »
Over the past decade, Nvidia’s revenue has climbed 2,300%, while its net income has surged 8,460%. This, in turn, has fueled stock price gains of 28,940% (as of this writing). As a result of its meteoric rise, the artificial intelligence (AI) chipmaker recently completed a 10-for-1 forward stock split after years of strong business and financial results. The new, lower share price paved the way for Nvidia’s inclusion in the Dow.
Despite Nvidia’s parabolic move higher, many on Wall Street believe the stock still has further to run.
Nvidia has long been known for its prowess in developing top-notch graphics processing units (GPUs) that are the first choice among serious gamers. In 1999, the company pioneered the use of parallel computing in its chips, which allows them to run a multitude of mathematical computations simultaneously. By breaking up these massive compute jobs into smaller, more manageable pieces, the company reinvented the gaming industry. In fact, as recently as early 2022, gaming still represented the majority of Nvidia’s revenue. But a paradigm shift was coming.
It didn’t take long before Nvidia realized it could use this technology in a variety of other applications. By 2006, scientists and data researchers discovered that GPUs could be used for other computationally intensive processes, including high-performance computing (HPC), machine learning (a subset of AI), and data centers.
Can Anything Stop Nvidia?
We’re now two years removed from OpenAI’s launch of ChatGPT, and there’s no doubt which company has been the biggest winner of the generative AI revolution so far.
Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), now best known for making cutting-edge chips capable of powering AI applications like ChatGPT, has seen its stock jump by 10 times since the beginning of 2023, making plenty of investors significantly richer. This month, it again became the world’s most valuable company, with a market cap of more than $3.5 trillion.
Are You Missing The Morning Scoop? Breakfast News delivers it all in a quick, Foolish, and free daily newsletter. Sign Up For Free »
Despite concerns that competition would bring it to heel or that the AI megatrend was inflating a bubble that would eventually burst, Nvidia has continued to deliver blowout results, and that pattern was on display once again in the fiscal 2025 third-quarter earnings report it delivered Wednesday.
Total revenue in the quarter jumped 94% year over year to $35.1 billion, topping the consensus estimate of $33.1 billion. The data center segment, where revenue jumped 112% to $30.8 billion, drove that growth, as demand for its graphics processing units (GPUs) continues to outstrip supply.
Profits also surged as the company continued to gain leverage on its operating expenses. On a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) basis, operating income jumped by 110% to $21.9 billion, and adjusted earnings per share surged from $0.40 to $0.81, ahead of the consensus estimate of $0.75.
Never before in history has a company as big as Nvidia grown so fast. Remarkably, its 94% revenue growth was its slowest pace on a percentage basis in six quarters, but it’s sustaining blistering growth rates for much longer than analysts had expected. The amount of revenue in dollar terms that it’s adding each quarter is also increasing sequentially, so the real growth of the business is accelerating even as its percentage growth moderates.
Earlier this year, some analysts were questioning whether the level of dominance Nvidia has established in the AI chip sector was sustainable. Advanced Micro Devices and Intel have launched their own competing AI accelerators. However, they have struggled to make a dent in Nvidia’s dominant market share. AMD disappointed the market with its latest earnings report and announced layoffs earlier this month, while Intel began a massive restructuring after its stock hit a 20-year low.
At this point, the key constraint on Nvidia’s growth is on the supply side, as CEO Jensen Huang recently said demand for its latest GPUs, built using its new Blackwell architecture, is “insane.”
Tesla says it has reached a ‘conditional’ settlement in Rivian trade secrets lawsuit
Tesla and Rivian may have resolved a lawsuit in which Tesla accused Rivian of poaching employees and stealing trade secrets.
Bloomberg reports that Tesla told a California statement judge that the companies have reached a “conditional” settlement, and that it expects to seek dismissal of the lawsuit by December 24.
Tesla filed the suit, which was set to got to trial in March, back in 2020. The EV maker alleged that it had discovered an “alarming pattern” in which Rivian was recruiting Tesla employees and encouraging them to take proprietary information with them as they left.
In response, Rivian filed to dismiss the suit, arguing that it was an “improper and malicious attempt to slow” the Rivian’s momentum and to scare Tesla employees who might be thinking of leaving.
Tesla did not immediately respond to TechCrunch’s request for comment. A Rivian spokesperson said the company does not comment on litigation.