BTB Highlights Revenue Growth and Strong Portfolio Performance in its Q3 2024 Financial Results

MONTRÉAL , Nov. 4, 2024 /CNW/ – BTB Real Estate Investment Trust BTB (“BTB“, the “REIT” or the “Trust“) announced today its financial results for the third quarter of 2024 ended September 30, 2024 (the “Third Quarter“).

“This quarter was marked by a good performance of our properties, except for one industrial asset where the tenant declared bankruptcy, resulting in a drop in our occupancy rate to 92.3%” said Michel Léonard, President and CEO of BTB. “For the cumulative nine-month period, rental income and net operating income from the same portfolio increased by 1.5% and 4.8%, respectively, compared to the same period last year. These results reflect the organic growth of our portfolio and our sound property management. Our FFO adjusted and AFFO adjusted also increased compared to the previous quarter, reflecting the good performance of our assets. Our debt ratios remained relatively stable, with a total debt ratio of 58.3% and a mortgage debt ratio of 52.5%. In fact, strategically, we are spreading out our mortgage refinancing maturities to try to balance the fluctuations in interest rates on mortgages concluded in recent months, and, with the latest announcements from the Central Bank of Canada, the outlook appears to bode well for future mortgage financing. Subsequent to the end of the quarter, we fully redeemed the Series G debenture that matured on October 31, 2024, using BTB’s available funds, which were generated primarily through mortgage financings. As of today, only the Series H debenture remains outstanding, which will mature on October 31, 2025. This strategy demonstrates our proactive and prudent approach to debt management in the current environment. We remain committed to our strategic priorities, including targeted dispositions and acquisitions, prudent capital management and ongoing property improvements. We are confident that our disciplined approach will continue to deliver strong results and drive long-term value creation for all our stakeholders.”

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ITEMS AS AT SEPTEMBER 30th, 2024

  • Total number of properties: 75
  • Total leasable area: 6.1 million square feet
  • Total value of assets: $1.2 billion
  • Market capitalization: $317 million (unit trading price of $3.61 as at September 30, 2024)

OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS

Periods ended September 30

Quarter

Cumulative (9 months)


2024

2023

2024

2023

Occupancy – committed (%)

92.3 %

93.7 %

Signed new leases (in sq.ft.)

18,713

25,476

116,855

217,900

Renewed leases at term (in sq.ft.)

47,109

52,178

297,345

258,131

Renewal rate (%)

58.4 %

52.2 %

75.3 %

58.1 %

Other ([1])

45,870

45,870

Renewed leases prior to the end of the term (in sq.ft.)

207,803

8,070

269,711

68,830

Increase in average lease renewal rate

2.4 %

11.9 %

4.6 %

7.1 %

  • During the quarter, the Trust completed a total of 254,912 square feet of lease renewals and 18,713 square feet of new leases. The occupancy rate decreased to 92.3%, representing a 230 basis points decrease compared to the prior quarter and a 140 basis points decrease compared to the same period in 2023. The decrease in occupancy is primarily due to the bankruptcy of Nuera Air. The Trust has already retained the services of a national commercial brokerage firm specialized in the industrial segment to lease the property. Mitigating this decrease is the addition of 45,870 square feet to the Trusts’ total leasable area recorded this quarter, as a result of the construction of an expansion to a necessity-based retail property located in Lévis, Québec, which is leased on a long-term basis to Winners/Home Sense. The increase in the average rent renewal rate for the current quarter and current cumulative nine-month period was respectively 2.4% and 4.6%.

FINANCIAL RESULTS HIGHLIGHTS

Periods ended September 30

Quarter

Cumulative (9 months)

(in thousands of dollars, except for ratios and per unit data)

2024

2023

2024

2023


$

$

$

$

Rental revenue

32,505

31,285

97,359

95,904

Net operating income (NOI)

18,753

18,075

55,969

56,124

Net income and comprehensive income

5,470

15,216

19,895

34,864

Adjusted EBITDA ([2])

18,030

16,544

52,606

51,654

Same-property NOI (2)

18,594

17,323

52,508

50,085

FFO Adjusted (2)

9,426

9,030

27,501

29,258

FFO Adjusted payout ratio

70.3 %

72.5 %

71.9 %

66.5 %

AFFO Adjusted (2)

8,581

7,675

24,630

25,990

AFFO Adjusted payout ratio

77.2 %

85.3 %

80.3 %

74.8 %

FINANCIAL RESULTS PER UNIT





Net income and comprehensive income

6.2¢

17.5¢

22.6¢

40.3¢

Distributions

7.5¢

7.5¢

22.5¢

22.5¢

FFO Adjusted (2)

10.7¢

10.4¢

31.3¢

33.8¢

AFFO Adjusted (2)

9.7¢

8.8¢

28.0¢

30.1¢

  • Rental revenue: Stood at $32.5 million for the current quarter, which represents an increase of 3.9% compared to the same quarter of 2023. For the cumulative nine-month period, rental revenue totaled $97.4 million which represents an increase of 1.5% compared to the same period in 2023. During Q1 2023, the Trust recorded a one-time $1.4 million increase of rental revenue pursuant to unrecorded revenue for previous quarters associated to a specific lease (the “One-Time Adjustment“). Excluding the One-Time Adjustment, rental revenue for the current cumulative nine-month period vs the same period in 2023 would have increased by 3.1%.
  • Net Operating Income (NOI): Totaled $18.8 million for the current quarter, which represents an increase of 3.8% compared to the same quarter of 2023. The increase for the quarter is due to operating improvements, higher rent renewal rates, and increases in rental spreads for in-place leases ($1.4 million). The recorded increase is partially offset by the bankruptcies of two tenants: (1) Énergie Cardio in Quebec City ($0.3 million), which space was rapidly leased to the group that purchased the assets of the bankrupt business and (2) Nuera Air, a tenant occupying 132,665 square feet in an industrial property in Laval, Québec ($0.5 million). For the cumulative nine-month period, the NOI totalled $56.0 million which represents a decrease of 0.3% compared to the same period in 2023. Excluding the One-Time adjustment, the cumulative nine-month period NOI for Q3 2024 vs the same period in 2023 would have increased by 2.3%.
  • Net income and comprehensive income: Totalled $5.5 million for the quarter compared to $15.2 million for the same period in 2023, representing a decrease of $9.7 million. The result for the quarter is affected by a $6.2 million non-cash net reduction in the gain of the fair value of investment properties and a $2.8 million non-cash loss in the net adjustment of the fair value of derivative financial instruments. For the cumulative nine-month period, net income and comprehensive income totalled $19.9 million, representing a decrease of $15 million. Excluding the One-Time Adjustment, the decrease for the cumulative nine-month period from Q3 2024 vs Q3 2023 would have been $13.5 million.
  • Same-property NOI (1): For the quarter, the same-property NOI increased by 7.3% compared to the same period in 2023, and for the cumulative nine-month period, the same-property NOI increased by 4.8% compared to the same period in 2023. These increases are due to higher rent renewal rates of 4.6% across all three segments of the portfolio. For the cumulative nine-month period, the Trust achieved increases of rent renewal rates of 5.8% for the industrial segment, 3.2% for the suburban office segment and 6.1% for the necessity-based retail segment. The industrial segment is also positively impacted by increases in rental rates for in-place leases.
  • FFO adjusted per unit (1): Was 10.7¢ per unit for the quarter compared to 10.4¢ per unit for the same period in 2023, representing an increase of 0.3¢ per unit. The increase of FFO adjusted for the quarter is explained by an increase in NOI of $0.7 million offset by an increase of interest expense net of financial income of $0.5 million. For the cumulative nine-month period, the FFO adjusted was 31.3¢ per unit compared to 33.8¢ per unit for the same period in 2023, representing a decrease of 2.5¢ per unit. Excluding the One-Time Adjustment, the cumulative nine-month period FFO adjusted per unit for Q3 2024 vs the same period in 2023 would have recorded a decrease of 0.9¢ per unit. In addition, FFO adjusted per unit was negatively impacted by an increase in weighted average number of units outstanding of 1.4 million units, due to the unitholder’s participation in the distribution reinvestment plan.
  • FFO adjusted payout ratio (1): Was 70.3% for the quarter compared to 72.5% for the same period in 2023, an improvement of 2.2%. For the cumulative nine-month period, the FFO adjusted payout ratio was 71.9% compared to 66.5% for the same period in 2023, an increase of 5.4%. Excluding the One-Time Adjustment, the cumulative nine-month period FFO adjusted payout ratio for Q3 2024 vs the same period in 2023 would have increased by 2.0%.
  • AFFO adjusted per unit (1): Was 9.7¢ per unit for the quarter compared to 8.8¢ per unit for the same period in 2023, representing an increase of 0.9¢ per unit, in line with the increase of FFO adjusted explained above. For the cumulative nine-month period, the AFFO adjusted per unit was 28.0¢ per unit compared to 30.1¢ per unit for the same period in 2023, representing a decrease of 2.1¢ per unit compared to the same period in 2023. Excluding the One-Time Adjustment, the cumulative nine-month period AFFO adjusted per unit would have decreased by 0.4¢ per unit. AFFO adjusted per unit was also negatively impacted by the increase in weighted average number of units outstanding of 1.4 million units, due to the unitholder’s participation in the distribution reinvestment plan.
  • AFFO adjusted payout ratio (1): W as 77.2% for the quarter compared to 85.3% for the same period in 2023. For the cumulative nine-month period, the AFFO adjusted payout ratio was 80.3% compared to 74.8% for the same period in 2023, representing an increase of 5.5%. Excluding the One-Time adjustment, the cumulative nine-month period AFFO adjusted payout ratio for Q3 2024 vs the same period in 2023 would have increased by 1.1%.

_____________________

(1)

Other adjustments on the occupied area represent mainly area remeasurements and new leases related to construction projects.

(2)

Non-IFRS financial measure. See Appendix 1. The referred non-IFRS financial measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and these measures cannot be compared to similar measures used by other issuers.

BALANCE SHEET AND LIQUIDITY HIGHLIGHTS

Periods ended September 30


(in thousands of dollars, except for ratios and per unit data)

September 30, 2024

September 30, 2023


$

$

Total assets

1,243,918

1,235,555

Total debt ratio (1)

58.3 %

58.4 %

Mortgage debt ratio (2)

52.5 %

52.2 %

Weighted average interest rate on mortgage debt

4.33 %

4.29 %

Market capitalization

316,841

258,250

NAV per unit (1)

5.43

5.57

  • Debt metrics: BTB ended the quarter with a total debt ratio (1) of 58.3%, a decrease of 30 basis points compared to December 31, 2023. The Trust ended the quarter with a mortgage debt ratio (1) of 52.5%, an increase of 30 basis points compared to December 31, 2023.
  • Liquidity position: The Trust held $3.3 million of cash at the end of the quarter and $29.3 million is available under its credit facilities. The Trust has the option to increase its capacity under credit facilities by $10.0 million, subject to lender approval. (1)(3)

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

  • On October 22, 2024, the Trust closed an additional revolving line of credit in the amount of $2 million, this increases the availability under its credit facilities to $31.3 million.
  • On October 31,2024, the Trust fully redeemed and paid at maturity the Series G unsecured convertible debentures at their nominal value of $24 million plus accrued interest of $0.7 million using proceeds sourced from mortgage loans.

___________________________

(1)

Non-IFRS financial measure. See Appendix 1. The referred non-IFRS financial measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and these measures cannot be compared to similar measures used by other issuers.

(2)

This is a non-IFRS financial measure. The mortgage debt ratio is calculated by dividing the mortgage loans outstanding by the total gross value of the assets of the Trust less cash and cash equivalents.

(3)

Credit facilities is a term used that reconciles with the bank loans as presented and defined in the Trust’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.

QUARTERLY CALL INFORMATION

Management will hold a conference call on Tuesday, November 5th, 2024, at 9 am, Eastern Time, to present BTB’s financial results and performance for the third quarter of 2024. Please note that the usual telephone numbers have changed.

The media and all interested parties may attend the call-in listening mode only. 

Conference call operators will coordinate the question-and-answer period (from analysts only) and will instruct participants regarding the procedures during the call.

The audio recording of the conference call will be available via playback until November 11th, 2024, by dialing: (+1) 289 819 1450 (local) or, (+1) 888 660 6345 (toll-free) and by entering the following access code: 44979 #

ABOUT BTB

BTB is a real estate investment trust listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. BTB REIT invests in industrial, suburban office and necessity-based retail properties across Canada for the benefit of their investors. As of today, BTB owns and manages 75 properties, representing a total leasable area of approximately 6.1 million square feet.

People and their stories are at the heart of our success.

For more detailed information, visit BTB’s website at www.btbreit.com.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This press release may contain forward-looking statements with respect to BTB. These statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “believe” or “continue” or the negative thereof or similar variations. The actual results and performance of BTB could differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Such statements are qualified in their entirety by the inherent risks and uncertainties surrounding future expectations. Some important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations include, among other things, general economic and market factors, competition, changes in government regulation, and the factors described from time to time in the documents filed by BTB with the securities regulators in Canada. The cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking statements attributable to BTB and persons acting on their behalf. Unless otherwise stated or required by applicable law, all forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release.

APPENDIX 1: RECONCILIATION OF NON-IFRS MEASURES

Non-IFRS Financial Measures

Certain terms used in this press release are listed and defined in the table hereafter, including any per unit information if applicable, are not measures recognized by International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and do not have standardized meanings prescribed by IFRS. Such measures may differ from similar computations as reported by similar entities and, accordingly, may not be comparable to similar measures. Explanations on how these non-IFRS financial measures provide useful information to investors and additional purposes, if any, for which the Trust uses these non- IFRS financial measures, are also included in the table hereafter.

Securities regulations require that non-IFRS financial measures be clearly defined and that they not be assigned greater weight than IFRS measures. The referred non-IFRS financial measures, which are reconciled to the most similar IFRS measure in the table thereafter if applicable, do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and these measures cannot be compared to similar measures used by other issuers.

NON-IFRS

MEASURE

DEFINITION

Adjusted net income

Adjusted net income is a non-IFRS financial measure that starts with net income and comprehensive income and removes the effects of: (i) fair value adjustment of investment properties; (ii) fair value adjustment of derivative financial instruments; (iii) fair value adjustment of Class B LP units; and (iv) transaction costs incurred for acquisitions and dispositions of investment properties and early repayment fees.

The Trust considers this to be a useful measure of operating performance, as fair value adjustments can fluctuate widely with the real estate market.

Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted

EBITDA”)

Adjusted EBITDA income is a non-IFRS financial measure that starts with net income and comprehensive income and removes the effects of certain adjustments, on a proportionate basis, including: (i) interest expense; (ii) taxes; (iii) depreciation of property and equipment; (iv) amortization of intangible assets; (v) fair value adjustments (including adjustments of investment properties, of derivative financial instruments, of Class B LP units and of unit price adjustments related to unit-based compensation); (vi) transaction costs for acquisitions and dispositions of investment properties and early repayment fees; and (vii) straight-line rental revenue adjustments.

The most directly comparable IFRS measure to Adjusted EBITDA is net income and comprehensive income. The Trust believes Adjusted EBITDA is a useful metric to determine its ability to service debt, to finance capital expenditures and to provide distributions to its Unitholders.

Same-Property NOI

Same-Property NOI is a non-IFRS financial measure defined as net operating income (“NOI”) for the properties that the Trust owned and operated for the entire duration of both the current year and the previous year. The most directly comparable IFRS measure to same-property NOI is Operating Income.

The Trust believes this is a useful measure as NOI growth can be assessed on its portfolio by excluding the impact of property acquisitions and dispositions of both the current year and previous year. The Trust uses the Same-Property NOI to indicate the profitability of its existing portfolio operations and the Trust’s ability to increase its revenues, reduce its operating costs and generate organic growth.

NON-IFRS

MEASURE

DEFINITION

Funds from Operations (“FFO”)

and FFO Adjusted

FFO is a non-IFRS financial measure used by most Canadian real estate investment trusts based on a standardized definition established by REALPAC in its January 2022 White Paper (“White Paper”). FFO is defined as net income and comprehensive income less certain adjustments, on a proportionate basis, including: (i) fair value adjustments on investment properties, class B LP units and derivative financial instruments; (ii) amortization of lease incentives; (iii) incremental leasing costs; and (iv) distribution on class B LP units. FFO is reconciled to net income and comprehensive income, which is the most directly comparable IFRS measure. FFO is also reconciled with the cash flows from operating activities, which is an IFRS measure.

FFO Adjusted is also a non-IFRS financial measure that starts with FFO and removes the impact of transaction costs on acquisitions and dispositions of investment properties and early repayment fees.

The Trust believes FFO and FFO Adjusted are key measures of operating performance and allow the investors to compare its historical performance.

Adjusted Funds from Operations (“AFFO”)

and

AFFO Adjusted

AFFO is a non-IFRS financial measure used by most Canadian real estate investment trusts based on a standardized definition established by REALPAC in its White Paper. AFFO is defined as FFO less: (i) straight-line rental revenue adjustment; (ii) accretion of effective interest; (iii) amortization of other property and equipment; (iv) unit-based compensation expenses; (v) provision for non-recoverable capital expenditures; and (vi) provision for unrecovered rental fees (related to regular leasing expenditures). AFFO is reconciled to net income and comprehensive income, which is the most directly comparable IFRS measure. AFFO is also reconciled with the cash flows from operating activities, which is an IFRS measure.

AFFO Adjusted is also a non-IFRS financial measure that starts with AFFO and removes the impact of transaction costs on acquisitions and dispositions of investment properties and early repayment fees.

The Trust considers AFFO and AFFO Adjusted to be useful measures of economic earnings and relevant in understanding its ability to service its debt, fund capital expenditures and provide distributions to unitholders.

NON-IFRS

MEASURE

DEFINITION

FFO and AFFO payout ratios

and

FFO Adjusted and AFFO Adjusted payout ratios

FFO and AFFO payout ratios and FFO Adjusted and AFFO Adjusted payout ratios are non-IFRS financial measures used by most Canadian real estate investment trusts based on a standardized definition established by REALPAC in its White Paper. These payout ratios are calculated by dividing the actual distributions per unit by FFO, AFFO and FFO Adjusted and AFFO Adjusted per unit in each period.

The Trust considers these metrics a useful way to evaluate its distribution paying capacity.

Total debt ratio

Total debt ratio is a non-IFRS financial measure of the Trust financial leverage, which is calculated by taking the total long-term debt less cash divided by total gross value of the assets of the Trust less cash.

The Trust considers this metric useful as it indicates its ability to meet its debt obligations and its capacity for future additional acquisitions.

Total mortgage debt ratio

Mortgage debt ratio is a non-IFRS financial measure of the Trust financial leverage, which is calculated by taking the total mortgage debt less cash divided by total gross value of the assets of the Trust less cash. 

The Trust considers this metric useful as it indicates its ability to meet its mortgage debt obligations and its capacity for future additional acquisitions.

Interest Coverage Ratio

Interest coverage ratio is a non-IFRS financial measure which is calculated by taking the Adjusted EBITDA divided by interest expenses net of financial income (interest expenses exclude early repayment fees, accretion of effective interest, distribution on Class B LP units, accretion of non-derivative liability component of convertible debentures and the fair value adjustment on derivative financial instruments and Class B LP units).

The Trust considers this metric useful as it indicates its ability to meet its interest cost obligations for a given period.

Debt Service Coverage Ratio

Debt service coverage ratio is a non-IFRS financial measure which is calculated by taking the Adjusted EBITDA divided by the Debt Service Requirements, which consists of principal repayments and interest expenses net of financial income (interest expenses exclude early repayment fees, accretion of effective interest, distribution on Class B LP units, accretion of non-derivative liability component of convertible debentures and the fair value adjustment on derivative financial instruments and Class B LP units).

The Trust considers this metric useful as it indicates its ability to meet its interest cost obligations for a given period.

Provision For Non- Recoverable Capital Expenditures

In calculating adjusted AFFO, the Trust deducts a provision for non- recoverable capital expenditures to consider capital expenditures invested to maintain the condition of its properties and to preserve rental revenue.

The provision for non-recoverable capital expenditures is calculated based on 2% of rental revenues. This provision is based on management’s assessment of industry practices and its investment forecasts for the coming years.

NON-IFRS FINANCIAL MEASURES – QUARTERLY RECONCILIATION

Funds from Operations (FFO) (1)

The following table provides a reconciliation of net income and comprehensive income established in accordance with IFRS and FFO (1) for the last eight quarters:


2024

2024

2024

2023

2023

2023

2023

2022

Q-3

Q-2

Q-1

Q-4

Q-3

Q-2

Q-1

Q-4

(in thousands of dollars, except for per unit)

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

Net income and comprehensive income (IFRS)

5,470

7,272

7,153

1,734

15,216

10,846

8,802

1,769

Fair value adjustment on investment properties

(283)

(6)

4,480

(6,481)

7,781

Fair value adjustment on Class B LP units

335

(21)

160

(42)

(159)

(775)

160

Amortization of lease incentives

807

704

690

641

664

750

728

787

Fair value adjustment on derivative financial

instruments

2,168

379

(325)

2,396

(584)

(763)

184

(1,971)

Leasing payroll expenses (6)

535

433

591

401

359

327

356

682

Distributions – Class B LP units

52

53

52

52

56

42

22

26

Unit-based compensation (Unit price change) (5)

342

63

409

(11)

(87)

(232)

(59)

198

FFO (1)

9,426

8,883

8,724

9,651

8,984

10,195

10,033

9,432

Transaction costs on disposition of investment properties and mortgage early repayment fees

266

201

37

46

627

FFO Adjusted (1)

9,426

9,149

8,925

9,688

9,030

10,195

10,033

10,059

FFO per unit (1) (2) (3)

10.7¢

10.1¢

10.0¢

11.1¢

10.3¢

11.8¢

11.7¢

11.0¢

FFO Adjusted per unit (1) (2) (4)

10.7¢

10.4¢

10.2¢

11.1¢

10.4¢

11.8¢

11.7¢

11.8¢

FFO payout ratio (1)

70.3 %

74.3 %

75.2 %

67.5 %

72.9 %

63.8 %

64.1 %

67.9 %

FFO Adjusted payout ratio (1)

70.3 %

72.2 %

73.5 %

67.2 %

72.5 %

63.8 %

64.1 %

63.6 %

(1)

This is a non-IFRS financial measure. The referred non-IFRS financial measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and these measures cannot be compared to similar measures used by other issuers.

(2)

Including Class B LP units.

(3)

The FFO per unit ratio is calculated by dividing the FFO (1) by the Trust’s unit outstanding at the end of the period (including the Class B LP units at outstanding at the end of the period).

(4)

The FFO Adjusted per unit ratio is calculated by dividing the FFO Adjusted (1) by the Trust’s unit outstanding at the end of the period (including the Class B LP units at outstanding at the end of the period).

(5)

The impact of the unit price change on the deferred unit-based compensation plan has been considered in the calculation of the FFO Adjusted and AFFO Adjusted starting Q2 2021.

(6)

The impact of the CIO compensation, hired in Q2 2022, was added to the Leasing payroll expenses during Q4 2022 as his duties were mainly leasing activities throughout the year.

Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO) (1)

The following table provides a reconciliation of FFO (1) and AFFO (1) for the last eight quarters:


2024

2024

2024

2023

2023

2023

2023

2022

Q-3

Q-2

Q-1

Q-4

Q-3

Q-2

Q-1

Q-4

(in thousands of dollars, except for per unit)

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

FFO (1)

9,426

8,883

8,724

9,651

8,984

10,195

10,033

9,432

Straight-line rental revenue adjustment

(247)

(183)

(394)

(197)

(842)

(291)

(633)

(1,077)

Accretion of effective interest

391

361

308

310

271

278

236

336

Amortization of other property and equipment

17

17

17

20

33

23

23

31

Unit-based compensation expenses

19

(95)

(9)

159

184

237

256

206

Provision for non-recoverable capital expenditures (1)

(650)

(644)

(653)

(639)

(626)

(634)

(658)

(630)

Provision for unrecovered rental fees (1)

(375)

(375)

(375)

(375)

(375)

(375)

(375)

(375)

AFFO (1)

8,581

7,964

7,618

8,929

7,629

9,433

8,882

7,923

Transaction costs on disposition of investment properties and mortgage early repayment fees

266

201

37

46

627

AFFO Adjusted (1)

8,581

8,230

7,819

8,966

7,675

9,433

8,882

8,550

AFFO per unit (1) (2) (3)

9.7¢

9.1¢

8.7¢

10.2¢

8.8¢

10.9¢

10.3¢

9.3¢

AFFO Adjusted per unit (1) (2) (4)

9.7¢

9.4¢

8.9¢

10.3¢

8.8¢

  10.9¢

  10.3¢

10.0¢

AFFO payout ratio (1)

77.2 %

82.9 %

86.2 %

72.9 %

85.8 %

69.0 %

72.4 %

80.8 %

AFFO Adjusted payout ratio (1)

77.2 %

80.2 %

83.9 %

72.6 %

85.3 %

69.0 %

72.4 %

74.9 %

(1)

This is a non-IFRS financial measure. The referred non-IFRS financial measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and these measures cannot be compared to similar measures used by other issuers.

(2)

Including Class B LP units.

(3)

The AFFO per unit ratio is calculated by dividing the AFFO (1) by the Trust’s unit outstanding at the end of the period (including the Class B LP units at outstanding at the end of the period).

(4)

The AFFO Adjusted per unit ratio is calculated by dividing the AFFO Adjusted (1) by the Trust’s unit outstanding at the end of the period (including the Class B LP units at outstanding at the end of the period).

Debt Ratios

The following table summarizes the Trust’s debt ratios as at September 30, 2024, and 2023 and December 31, 2023:

(in thousands of dollars)

September 30,

2024

December 31,

2023

September 30,

2023


$

$

$

Cash and cash equivalents

(3,252)

(912)

(2,357)

Mortgage loans outstanding (1)

655,686

640,425

644,147

Convertible debentures (1)

43,476

43,185

43,093

Credit facilities

28,171

36,359

36,363

Total long-term debt less cash and cash equivalents (2) (3)

724,081

719,057

721,246

Total gross value of the assets of the Trust less cash and cash

equivalents (2) (4)

1,241,931

1,227,949

1,234,391

Mortgage debt ratio (excluding convertible debentures and credit facilities) (2) (5)

52.5 %

52.2 %

52.2 %

Debt ratio – convertible debentures (2) (6)

3.5 %

3.5 %

3.5 %

Debt ratio – credit facilities (2) (7)

2.3 %

3.0 %

2.9 %

Total debt ratio (2)

58.3 %

58.6 %

58.4 %

(1)

Before unamortized financing expenses and fair value assumption adjustments.

(2)

This is a non-IFRS financial measure. The referred non-IFRS financial measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and these measures cannot be compared to similar measures used by other issuers.

(3)

Long-term debt cash and cash equivalents is a non-IFRS financial measure, calculated as total of: (i) fixed rate mortgage loans payable; (ii) floating rate mortgage loans payable; (iii) Series G debenture capital amount; (iv) Series F debenture capital adjusted with non-derivative component less conversion options exercised by holders; and (v) credit facilities, less cash and cash equivalents. The most directly comparable IFRS measure to net debt is debt.

(4)

Gross value of the assets of the Trust less cash and cash equivalent (GVALC) is a non-IFRS financial measure defined as the Trust total assets adding the cumulated amortization property and equipment and removing the cash and cash equivalent. The most directly comparable IFRS measure to GVALC is total assets.

(5)

Mortgage debt ratio is calculated by dividing the mortgage loans outstanding by the GVALC.

(6)

Debt ratio – convertible debentures is calculated by dividing the convertible debentures by the GVALC.

(7)

Debt ratio – credit facilities is calculated by dividing the credit facilities by the GVALC.

SOURCE BTB Real Estate Investment Trust

Cision View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/November2024/04/c1462.html

© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Olema Oncology Reports Inducement Grants Under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c)(4)

SAN FRANCISCO, Nov. 04, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ((“Olema” or “Olema Oncology”, NASDAQ:OLMA), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development, and commercialization of targeted therapies for breast cancer and beyond, today announced that the Company granted stock options to one new employee to purchase an aggregate of 2,500 shares of the Company’s common stock, effective as of November 1, 2024. These awards were approved by the Compensation Committee of Olema’s Board of Directors and granted under the Company’s 2022 Inducement Plan, with a grant date of November 1, 2024, as an inducement material to the new employees entering into employment with Olema, in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c)(4).

The stock options vest over four years, with 25 percent vesting on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date for such employee and the remainder vesting in 36 equal monthly installments over the following three years, subject to the employee being continuously employed by Olema as of such vesting dates. The stock options have a 10-year term and an exercise price of $11.62 per share, equal to the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock as reported by Nasdaq on November 1, 2024. The stock options are subject to the terms of the Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2022 Inducement Plan.

Olema is providing this information in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c)(4).

About Olema Oncology
Olema Oncology is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company committed to transforming the standard of care and improving outcomes for women living with cancer. Olema is advancing a pipeline of novel therapies by leveraging our deep understanding of endocrine-driven cancers, nuclear receptors, and mechanisms of acquired resistance. Our lead product candidate, palazestrant (OP-1250), is a proprietary, orally-available complete estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist (CERAN) and a selective ER degrader (SERD), currently in a Phase 3 clinical trial called OPERA-01. In addition, Olema is developing a potent KAT6 inhibitor (OP-3136). Olema is headquartered in San Francisco and has operations in Cambridge, Massachusetts. For more information, please visit us at www.olema.com.

IR and Media Contact
Courtney O’Konek, Vice President, Corporate Communications
media@olema.com


Primary Logo

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

Aura Announces Q3 2024 Quarterly Financial and Operational Results

ROAD TOWN, British Virgin Islands, Nov. 04, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Aura Minerals Inc. ORA (B3: AURA33) ORAAF (“Aura” or the “Company“) announces that it has filed its unaudited consolidated financial statements and management discussion and analysis (together, “Financial and Operational Results“) for the period ended September 30, 2024 (“Q3 2024“). The full version of the Financial and Operational Results can be viewed on the Company’s website at www.auraminerals.com or on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. All amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars unless stated otherwise.

Rodrigo Barbosa, President, and CEO of Aura, commented, “We are pleased to report that we entered the first nine months of 2024 on a robust growth trajectory, achieving our fifth consecutive increase in LTM production and reaching a record-high EBITDA of US$187 million. In Q3 2024, with an average gold price of US$2,507 / Oz, we achieved record-high Adjusted EBITDA for a single quarter, at $78.1 million, over 39% higher than Q2 2024. In addition to higher production and higher gold prices, we also managed to have a 3% reduction in our AISC per GEO, keeping us on track to achieve our production and cash cost Guidance for the year. Moreover, the construction of Borborema is now 54% complete and remains on schedule, with ramp-up start anticipated for Q1 2025, setting the stage for a strong year ahead.”

Q3 2024 Financial and Operational Highlights:

(US$ thousand):

    For the three months ended September 30, 2024
  For the three months ended September 30, 2023   For the nine months ended September 30, 2024
  For the nine months ended September 30, 2023
Total Production¹ (GEO)   68,246     64,875     200,758     166,662  
Sales² (GEO)   68,172     63,516     200,517     165,352  
Net Revenue   156,157     110,635     422,646     292,572  
Adjusted EBITDA   78,073     30,020     187,449     93,214  
AISC per GEO sold   1,292     1,436     1,302     1,329  
Ending Cash balance   195,979     178,989     195,979     178,989  
Net Debt   144,366     112,110     144,366     112,110  
Income/(Loss) for the period   (11,923 )   7,759     (46,915 )   37,788  
Adjusted Net Income   43,386     7,621     54,894     37,835  
(1) Considers capitalized production
(2) Does not consider capitalized production
 
  • In Q3 2024, production reached 68,246 gold equivalent ounces (“GEO“), 10% above Q2 2024 and 10% above the same period last year, at constant metal prices. The highlights of the quarter were the performance of Almas, where production stabilized at 15k GEO after the contractor replacement in Q2 2024, reaching what the Company considers a consistent level for the operation, and Minosa, which recorded another quarterly production growth. For the nine months of 2024, Aura’s total production was 200,758 GEO at current prices, 20% above the same period last year.
    • Aranzazu: Stable quarter with 24,486 GEO produced, up 8% from Q2 2024 and down 3% from Q3 2023. Improved recovery rates due to higher ore grades and mine sequencing. Cumulative production for 9M 2024 reached 70,492 GEO, steady compared to 9M 2023.
    • Minosa: Produced 20,750 GEO, an 8% increase from the previous quarter and 18% from Q3 2023, driven by higher ore stacking and grades. Rainy season impact was limited, boosting productivity. 9M 2024 cumulative production reached 59,078 GEO, a 23% rise over 9M 2023.
    • Almas: Production reached 14,975 GEO, up 42% from the previous quarter due to increased productivity and efficiency after transitioning to a new contractor. Monthly production stabilized at 5,000 GEO since June 2024. 9M 2024 production totaled 37,450 GEO, supporting confidence in meeting 2024 guidance.
    • Apoena: Produced 8,035 GEO, down 19% from Q2 2024 and 28% from Q3 2023, due to lower grades from delayed environmental permits. Lower mill throughput due to harder rock ore affected Q3 output. 9M 2024 production totaled 30,052 GEO, a 2% decrease from 9M 2023.
  • Sales volumes increased by 8% from Q2 2024 and 7% when compared to the same period of 2023, mainly driven by performance in Almas and Minosa during the quarter, although partially offset by Apoena´s lower production. In the 9M 2024, sales volume increased by 21%, also driven by the improvements in Minosa and achieving full operation in Almas, which commenced in August 2023.
  • Revenues reached US$156,157 in Q3 2024, representing an increase of 16% compared to Q2 2024 and 41% compared to the same period in 2023. In 9M 2024, revenues reached US$422,646, a 44% increase in comparison to 9M 2023.
    • Average gold sale prices increased 9% in Q3 2024 compared to Q2 2024, with an average of US$2,507/oz in the quarter. Compared to the same period in 2023, average gold sale prices increased 29% in Q3 2024. In 9M 2024, average gold sale prices reached US$2,289, a 19% increase when compared to 9M 2023.
    • Average copper sale prices decreased 7% when compared to Q2 2024, with an average of US$4.18/lb in the quarter. Compared to the same period in 2023, average copper prices increased by 7% in Q3 2024. In 9M 2024, average copper prices reached US$4.17/lb, a 5% increase when compared to 9M 2023.
  • Record-high Adjusted EBITDA of US$78,073 during Q3 2024, surpassing the second-best quarter ever by over 30%. This performance was driven by favorable metal prices, strong production, and reduced cash costs. Adjusted EBITDA increased by 39% compared to US$56,172 in Q2 2024. Compared to Q3 2023, cash costs per GEO decreased by 11%, and, combined with higher sales and rising gold prices, which led to a 160% improvement in Adjusted EBITDA. This growth was primarily attributed to higher gold and copper prices, increased sales volumes and costs reduction. For the first nine months of 2024, Adjusted EBITDA reached US$187,449, marking a 101% increase compared to the same period in 2023.
  • AISC¹ for Q3 2024 was US$1,292/GEO, reflecting a decrease of US$36/GEO from Q2 2024 (US$1,328/GEO), due to lower AISCs at Almas, Minosa, and Apoena. However, this improvement was partially offset by a rise in AISC at Aranzazu, mainly influenced by metal prices and the impact in GEO Conversion. For the first nine months of 2024, AISC averaged US$1,302/GEO, representing a reduction of US$28/GEO compared to 9M 2023 (US$1,330/GEO).
  • Despite all investments in expansion, including Borborema, by the end of Q3 2024, the Company’s Net Debt position was US$144,366, stable when compared to US$142,409 reported in the previous quarter with an LTM net debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 0.63x, a reduction from 0.79x recorded at the end of Q2 2024.
  • Recurring Free Cash Flow to Firm reached US$65 million in the quarter and US$115 million in 9M 2024, largely driven by the increase in EBITDA in the periods.
  • Net loss of US$11,923 in 3Q 2024, a decrease compared to a net income of US$7,759 in Q3 2023, mainly due to non-cash losses related to mark-to-market (MTM) gold hedges amounting to US$56,684. For 9M 2024, net loss reached US$46,915, also largely due to non-cash losses on gold hedges of US$89,532 during the period.
  • Adjusted income in Q3 2024 was positive at US$43,386, which excluded non-cash losses related to gold hedges in the period, due to the appreciation of gold prices, increase in production and reduction in cash costs. For the 9M 2024, the Adjusted Net income reached positive US$54,894, providing a measurement of profitability adjusted for the same factors in the year.

Guidance:

________________________________________
¹ AISC is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standardized meaning under IFRS, and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and detailed reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measures, see Section 18 in the MD&A: Non-GAAP Performance Measures in this MD&A.

The Company is on track to meet its guidance for the current fiscal year, including production, cash cost, All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC), and capital expenditures, as demonstrated by the results of the first nine months.

 
Gold equivalent thousand ounces
(‘000 GEO) production – 2024
 
  Low – 2024 High – 2024 9M 2024 A %
Minosa (San Andrés) 60 75 59 79% – 98%
Apoena (EPP) 46 56 30 53% – 66%
Aranzazu 94 108 74 68% – 79%
Almas 45 53 37 71% – 84%
Total 244 292 201 69% – 82%
Cash Cost per equivalent ounce of
gold produced – 2024
 
  Low – 2024 High – 2024 9M 2024 A Δ Low Δ High
Minosa (San Andrés) 1,120 1,288 1,090 -3% -15%
Apoena (EPP) 1,182 1,300 983 -17% -24%
Aranzazu 826 1,009 960 16% -5%
Almas 932 1,025 1,065 14% 4%
Total 984 1,140 1,022 4% -10%
AISC per equivalent ounce of gold
produced – 2024
 
  Low – 2024 High – 2024 9M 2024 A Δ Low Δ High
Minosa (San Andrés) 1,216 1,398 1,176 -3% -16%
Apoena (EPP) 1,588 1,747 1,607 1% -8%
Aranzazu 1,089 1,331 1,269 17% -5%
Almas 1,179 1,297 1,330 13% 3%
Total 1,290 1,459 1,302 1% -11%
Capex (US$ million) – 2024
 
  Low – 2024 High – 2024 9M 2024 A %
Sustaining 37 43 28 65% – 75%
Exploration 7 8 7 90% – 105%
New projects + Expansion 144 169 79 47% – 55%
Total 188 219 114 52% – 60%
         

Q3 2024 Earnings Call

The Company will hold an earnings conference call on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, at 8:00 AM (Eastern Time). To register and participate, please click the link below.

Date: November 5, 2024

Time: 8:00 AM (New York and Toronto) | 10:00 AM (Brasília)

Access Link: Click here

Key Factors

The Company’s future profitability, operating cash flows, and financial position will be closely related to the prevailing prices of gold and copper. Key factors influencing the price of gold and copper include, but are not limited to, the supply of and demand for gold and copper, the relative strength of currencies (particularly the United States dollar), and macroeconomic factors such as current and future expectations for inflation and interest rates. Management believes that the short-to-medium term economic environment is likely to remain relatively supportive for commodity prices but with continued volatility.

To decrease risks associated with commodity prices and currency volatility, the Company will continue to evaluate and implement available protection programs. For additional information on this, please refer to the AIF.

Other key factors influencing profitability and operating cash flows are production levels (impacted by grades, ore quantities, process recoveries, labor, country stability, plant, and equipment availabilities), production and processing costs (impacted by production levels, prices, and usage of key consumables, labor, inflation, and exchange rates), among other factors.

Non-GAAP Measures

In this press release, the Company has included Adjusted EBITDA, cash operating costs per gold equivalent ounce sold, AISC and net debt which are non-GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning within IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. The Company believes that these measures provide investors with additional information which is useful in evaluating the Company’s performance and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The below tables provide a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures presented:

Reconciliation from Income for the Quarter for EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA (US$ thousand):

    For the three months ended September 30, 2024
  For the three months ended September 30, 2023   For the nine months ended September 30, 2024
  For the nine months ended September 30, 2023
Profit (loss) from continued and discontinued operation   (11,923 )   7,759     (46,915 )   37,788  
Income tax (expense) recovery   11,833     6,758     36,588     17,200  
Deferred income tax (expense) recovery   (1,995 )   1,095     5,738     (6,323 )
Finance costs   62,691     5,477     141,888     12,505  
Other gains (losses)   359     (4,517 )   952     (5,736 )
Depreciation   17,108     13,449     49,198     37,781  
EBITDA   78,073     30,020     187,449     93,214  
Impairment                
ARO Change                
Adjusted EBITDA   78,073     30,020     187,449     93,214  
                         

Reconciliation from the consolidated financial statements to cash operating costs per gold equivalent ounce sold (US$ thousand):

    For the three months ended September 30, 2024
  For the three months ended September 30, 2023   For the nine months ended September 30, 2024
  For the nine months ended September 30, 2023
Cost of goods sold   (83,976 )   (84,097 )   (252,475 )   (206,691 )
Depreciation   16,686     13,408     47,577     37,242  
COGS w/o Depreciation   (67,290 )   (70,689 )   (204,898 )   (169,449 )
Gold Equivalent Ounces sold   68,172     63,516     200,517     165,352  
Cash costs per gold equivalent ounce sold   987     1,113     1,022     1,025  
                         

Reconciliation from the consolidated financial statements to all in sustaining costs per gold equivalent ounce sold (US$ thousand):

    For the three months ended September 30, 2024
  For the three months ended September 30, 2023   For the nine months ended September 30, 2024
  For the nine months ended September 30, 2023  
Cost of goods sold   (83,976 )   (84,097 )   (252,475 )   (206,691 )
Depreciation   16,686     13,408     47,577     37,242  
COGS w/o Depreciation   (67,290 )   (70,689 )   (204,898 )   (169,449 )
Capex w/o Expansion   13,535     13,734     34,725     34,082  
Site G&A   2,444     2,828     7,900     6,661  
Lease Payments   4,810     3,985     13,490     9,636  
Sub-Total          
Gold Equivalent Ounces sold   68,172     63,516     200,517     165,352  
All In Sustaining costs per ounce sold   1,292     1,436     1,302     1,329  
                         

Reconciliation Net Debt (US$ thousand):

    For the three months ended September 30, 2024
  For the three months ended September 30, 2023
Short Term Loans   163,115     101,047  
Long-Term Loans   177,444     197,714  
Plus / (Less): Derivative Financial Instrument for Debentures   (214 )   (7,662 )
Less: Cash and Cash Equivalents   (195,979 )   (178,989 )
Less: Restricted cash        
Less: Short term investments        
Net Debt   144,366     112,110  
             

About Aura 360° Mining

Aura is focused on mining in complete terms – thinking holistically about how its business impacts and benefits every one of our stakeholders: our company, our shareholders, our employees, and the countries and communities we serve. We call this 360° Mining.

Aura is a mid-tier gold and copper production company focused on operating and developing gold and base metal projects in the Americas. The Company has 4 operating mines including the Aranzazu copper-gold-silver mine in Mexico, the Apoena (EPP) and Almas gold mines in Brazil, and the Minosa (San Andres) gold mine in Honduras. The Company’s development projects include Borborema and Matupá both in Brazil. Aura has unmatched exploration potential owning over 630,000 hectares of mineral rights and is currently advancing multiple near-mine and regional targets along with the Aura Carajas copper project in the prolific Carajás region of Brazil.

Forward-Looking Information

This press release contains “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements”, as defined in applicable securities laws (collectively, “forward-looking statements”) which may include, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans,” “expects,” “is expected,” “budget,” “scheduled,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “anticipates,” or “believes” or variations (including negative variations) of such words and phrases, or state that certain actions, events or results “may,” “could,” “would,” “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved.

Known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s ability to predict or control, could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Specific reference is made to the most recent Annual Information Form on file with certain Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities for a discussion of some of the factors underlying forward-looking statements, which include, without limitation, volatility in the prices of gold, copper and certain other commodities, changes in debt and equity markets, the uncertainties involved in interpreting geological data, increases in costs, environmental compliance and changes in environmental legislation and regulation, interest rate and exchange rate fluctuations, general economic conditions and other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect the forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements herein are qualified by this cautionary statement. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information or future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law. If the Company does update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that it will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements.

Financial Outlook and Future-Oriented Financial Information

To the extent any forward-looking statements in this press release constitute “financial outlooks” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation, such information is being provided as certain estimated financial metrics and the reader is cautioned that this information may not be appropriate for any other purpose and the reader should not place undue reliance on such financial outlooks. Such information was approved by the company’s Board of Directors on November 4, 2024. Financial outlooks, as with forward-looking statements generally, are, without limitation, based on the assumptions and subject to various risks as set out herein. The Company’s actual financial position and results of operations may differ materially from management’s current expectations and, as a result, may differ materially from values provided in this press release.


For more information, please contact:
Investor Relations
ri@auraminerals.com
www.auraminerals.com

Primary Logo

© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Tradepulse Power Inflow Alert: Autozone Inc. Mover Over 30 Points Higher After Signal

STOCK CLIMBS OVER 1 % AT ITS HIGH POINT

Today, AutoZone, Inc. AZO experienced a power inflow, a significant event for those who follow where the smart money goes and value order flow analytics in their trading decisions. 

Today, at 10:46 AM on November 4th, a significant trading signal occurred for AutoZone, Inc. as it demonstrated a Power Inflow at a price of $3026.84. This indicator is crucial for traders who want to know directionally where institutions and so-called “smart money” moves in the market. They see the value of utilizing order flow analytics to guide their trading decisions. The Power Inflow points to a possible uptrend in AutoZone’s stock, marking a potential entry point for traders looking to capitalize on the expected upward movement. Traders with this signal closely watch for sustained momentum in AutoZone’s stock price, interpreting this event as a bullish sign.

Signal description

Order flow analytics, aka transaction or market flow analysis, separate and study both the retail and institutional volume rate of orders (flow). It involves analyzing the flow of buy and sell orders, along with size, timing, and other associated characteristics and patterns, to gain insights and make more informed trading decisions. This particular indicator is interpreted as a bullish signal by active traders. 

The Power Inflow occurs within the first two hours of the market open and generally signals the trend that helps gauge the stock’s overall direction, powered by institutional activity in the stock, for the remainder of the day. 

By incorporating order flow analytics into their trading strategies, market participants can better interpret market conditions, identify trading opportunities, and potentially improve their trading performance. But let’s not forget that while watching smart money flow can provide valuable insights, it is crucial to incorporate effective risk management strategies to protect capital and mitigate potential losses. Employing a consistent and effective risk management plan helps traders navigate the uncertainties of the market in a more controlled and calculated manner, increasing the likelihood of long-term success

If you want to stay updated on the latest options trades for AZO, Benzinga Pro gives you real-time options trades alerts. 

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs and include firms, like Finit USA, responsible for parts of the data within this article.

© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

After Market Close UPDATE:

The price at the time of the Power Inflow was $3026.84. The returns on the High price ($3057.42) and Close price ($3046.36) after the Power Inflow were respectively 1.0% and 0.6%. That is why it is important to have a trading plan that includes Profit Targets and Stop Losses that reflect your risk appetite.

Past Performance is Not Indicative of Future Results

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

Evaluating Vistra Against Peers In Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

In the fast-paced and highly competitive business world of today, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry observers. In this article, we will conduct an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Vistra VST in relation to its major competitors in the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. Through a detailed examination of key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and illuminate company’s performance in the industry.

Vistra Background

Vistra Energy is one of the largest power producers and retail energy providers in the us Following the 2024 Energy Harbor acquisition, Vistra owns 41 gigawatts of nuclear, coal, natural gas, and solar power generation along with one of the largest utility-scale battery projects in the world. Its retail electricity business serves 5 million customers in 20 states, including almost a third of all Texas electricity consumers. Vistra emerged from the Energy Future Holdings bankruptcy as a stand-alone entity in 2016. It acquired Dynegy in 2018.

Company P/E P/B P/S ROE EBITDA (in billions) Gross Profit (in billions) Revenue Growth
Vistra Corp 87.88 13.17 3.07 10.2% $1.29 $1.62 20.57%
The AES Corp 10.22 3.18 0.85 15.73% $1.01 $0.72 -4.22%
Central Puerto SA 10.16 1.09 4.70 0.43% $70.68 $59.33 9.64%
Average 10.19 2.14 2.77 8.08% $35.85 $30.02 2.71%

When conducting a detailed analysis of Vistra, the following trends become clear:

  • At 87.88, the stock’s Price to Earnings ratio significantly exceeds the industry average by 8.62x, suggesting a premium valuation relative to industry peers.

  • It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 13.17 which exceeds the industry average by 6.15x.

  • The Price to Sales ratio of 3.07, which is 1.11x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.

  • With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 10.2% that is 2.12% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.

  • The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $1.29 Billion is 0.04x below the industry average, suggesting potential lower profitability or financial challenges.

  • The gross profit of $1.62 Billion is 0.05x below that of its industry, suggesting potential lower revenue after accounting for production costs.

  • With a revenue growth of 20.57%, which surpasses the industry average of 2.71%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.

Debt To Equity Ratio

debt to equity

The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company’s capital structure.

Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company’s financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.

By analyzing Vistra in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:

  • Among its top 4 peers, Vistra is placed in the middle with a moderate debt-to-equity ratio of 5.43.

  • This implies a balanced financial structure, with a reasonable proportion of debt and equity.

Key Takeaways

For Vistra, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all high compared to its peers in the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating potentially overvalued stock. On the other hand, Vistra’s high ROE and revenue growth suggest strong performance relative to its competitors. However, the low EBITDA and gross profit levels may raise concerns about the company’s operational efficiency and profitability compared to industry peers.

This article was generated by Benzinga’s automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

Fannie Mae Announces the Results of its Thirty-third Reperforming Loan Sale Transaction

WASHINGTON, Nov. 4, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — Fannie Mae FNMA today announced the results of its thirty-third reperforming loan sale transaction. The deal, announced on October 8, 2024, included the sale of 8,678 loans totaling $1,424,118,043 in unpaid principal balance (UPB), offered in three pools. The winning bidder for Pool 1 and Pool 2 was Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, and for Pool 3 was JP Morgan Mortgage Acquisitions Corp. The transaction is expected to close by December 20, 2024. The pools were marketed with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. as advisor.

The loan pool awarded in this most recent transaction includes:

  • Pool 1: 2,924 loans with an aggregate UPB of $510,578,698; average loan size of $174,617; weighted average note rate of 3.82%; and weighted average broker’s price opinion (BPO) loan-to-value ratio of 47%.
  • Pool 2: 3,311 loans with an aggregate UPB of $524,573,434; average loan size of $158,434; weighted average note rate of 4.03%; and weighted average broker’s price opinion (BPO) loan-to-value ratio of 48%.
  • Pool 3: 2,443 loans with an aggregate UPB of $388,965,911; average loan size of $159,217; weighted average note rate of 3.96%; and weighted average broker’s price opinion (BPO) loan-to-value ratio of 49%.

The cover bid, which is the second highest bid for the pool, was 83.55% of UPB (32.26% of BPO) for Pool 1, 84.375% of UPB (31.73% of BPO) for Pool 2, and 82.09% of UPB (31.98% of BPO) for Pool 3.

Reperforming loans are loans that have been or are currently delinquent but have reperformed for a period of time. The terms of Fannie Mae’s reperforming loan sale require the buyer to offer loss mitigation options to any borrower who may re-default within five years following the closing of the reperforming loan sale. All purchasers are required to honor any approved or in-process loss mitigation efforts at the time of sale, including loan modifications. In addition, purchasers must offer delinquent borrowers a waterfall of loss mitigation options, including loan modifications, which may include principal forgiveness or payment deferral prior to initiating foreclosure on any loan.

Interested bidders can register for ongoing announcements, training, and other information here. Fannie Mae will also post information about specific pools available for purchase on that page.

About Fannie Mae
Fannie Mae advances equitable and sustainable access to homeownership and quality, affordable rental housing for millions of people across America. We enable the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage and drive responsible innovation to make homebuying and renting easier, fairer, and more accessible. To learn more, visit: fanniemae.com | X (formerly Twitter) | Facebook | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube | Blog

Fannie Mae Newsroom
https://www.fanniemae.com/news

Photo of Fannie Mae
https://www.fanniemae.com/resources/img/about-fm/fm-building.tif

Fannie Mae Resource Center
1-800-2FANNIE

 

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fannie-mae-announces-the-results-of-its-thirty-third-reperforming-loan-sale-transaction-302295665.html

SOURCE Fannie Mae

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

source

'Messi Of AI': Wall Street Analyst Gushes Over 'Robust' Earnings From Palantir

Wedbush analyst Dan Ives is out with an early reaction to Palantir Technologies Inc.’s PLTR “eye-popping” results, featuring beats across the board.

What To Know: Palantir, which Ives calls “The Messi of AI,” beat analyst estimates on the top and bottom lines when it reported third-quarter financial results after the market close on Monday.

Total revenue jumped 30% year-over-year as the company’s customer count grew 39%. Palantir issued fourth-quarter guidance above estimates and raised its full-year outlook across all metrics, citing “unrelenting AI demand that won’t slow down.”

“Palantir delivered another robust quarter featuring beats across the board as the company continues to see accelerated deal momentum with AIP front and center,” Ives wrote in a new note to clients following the print.

The Wedbush analyst noted that potential re-ratings are focused on U.S. Commercial strength, which remained robust in the quarter. Ives also noted U.S. Government revenue was a bright spot in the quarter with 40% year-over-year growth.

“Despite the skeptics honing in on valuation for the past year, this was a major quarter to prove that PLTR’s partner ecosystem expansion and AIP bootcamps hit another gear,” Ives said.

See Also: EXCLUSIVE: Top 20 Most-Searched Tickers On Benzinga Pro In October 2024 — Where Do Tesla, Nvidia, Apple, DJT Stock Rank?

Palantir said it closed 104 deals worth over $1 million during the quarter. Ives explained that more and more companies are turning to Palantir to meet the rising demand for enterprise-scale generative AI solutions. He also noted Palantir is gaining share in the AI revolution.

Ives sees Palantir’s strong forward guidance as evidence that the company continues to drive pipeline growth for its AI platform AIP. Palantir guided for fourth-quarter revenue of $767 million to $771 million, which Ives said is “well ahead” of Street estimates. He also highlighted that the full-year guidance raise indicates that demand for Palantir solutions continues to accelerate, especially on the commercial side of the business.

The Wedbush analyst maintained an Outperform rating on Palantir stock following the print. It’s likely that the firm will update its price target after it digests all of the reported information for Palantir’s latest quarter.

“We look forward to hearing more on the conference call tonight regarding further momentum around AIP conversion, U.S. commercial strength, government deal cycles, and more details about its Warp Speed product,” Ives said.

PLTR Price Action: Palantir shares were up 12.77% in after-hours, trading at $46.70 at the time of publication Monday, according to Benzinga Pro.

Read Next:

Photo: Shutterstock.

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

While Stellantis Performed Below Its Potential, Li Auto Reported Strong And Record Numbers

On Thursday, both Stellantis STLA and Li Auto Inc LI issued their third quarter results and they told quite different tales. While Stellantis reported a disappointing performance, Li Auto topped estimates with record deliveries and strong financials, however, its stock fell nevertheless. 

Stellantis reported weak financials, but this was expected. 

 Considering that the trans-Atlantic automaker issued a profit warning back in September as it trimmed its annual guidance in response to the deteriorating global industry dynamics and needing to fix its performance in North America. Unfortunately, shipments fell in Europe as well with stringent quality requirements delaying the start of a few high-volume items.

Jeep, Dodge, Fiat, Chrysler and Peugeot owner said that net revenues for the September quarter came in at 33 billion euros, which is about $35.8 billion and largely below LSEG’s consensus estimate of 36.6 billion euros as it slumped 27%. However, Stellantis reaffirmed that it remains on track to deliver about 20 new models this year, adding that it was making good progress on slashing bloated inventories, especially in the U.S. 

CFO Doug Ostermann admitted that the quarterly performance was below the automaker’s potential but also emphasized that U.S. inventories had been meaningfully reduced and reaffirmed that targets will be hit. However, with progress resolving challenges Stellantis expects to soon benefit from its significantly expanded reach with the new product wave, from 2025 and beyond.

According to Cox Automotive, Stellantis has some of the highest inventories of vehicles on dealer lots out of all brands in the U.S. In addition, Stellantis escalated its long battle with the UAW with a lawsuit over strike threats. Like many of its peers, Stellantis has been struggling with a perfect storm of challenges on the EV road, including faltering global EV demand and severe competition from China.

Meanwhile, Li Auto’s financials reflected its emerging NEV leader position in China.

Having grown deliveries by as much as 45.4%, Li Auto also grew its revenues by 23.6% as they reached $6.1 billion. Its NEV market share grew to 17.3%.

CEO, Xiang Li also revealed that cumulative vehicle deliveries have surpassed 1 million units, which means that LI Auto achieved this milestone achieved faster than its NEV peers.

However, its outlook was not as shiny considering the delayed entry to Western Europe and North America, as the focus remains on the Middle East and Central Asia. Li Auto plans to continue advancing on the autonomous driving front, with significant enhancements on the three to five years horizon. 

The EV landscape continues to evolve

Also this week, Worksport Ltd. WKSP, an established innovative manufacturer of clean energy solutions for light trucks and the consumer goods sector, announced an upgrade of its solar-powered tonneau cover SOLIS. Worksport initated the alpha launch of its revolutionary off-grid power on the go duo, the SOLIS and the COR, a portable battery system back in September. Worksport now revealed that the SOLIS will be meaningfully improved to operate at 60V, which should result in substantial cost savings to the end- consumer of up to $400, while expand its addressable market size, and simplifying integration with a wider range of existing battery generator systems. Generating clean and portable power for both recreational and professional use, Worksport positioned itself in a rapidly growing market whose value surpasses $4 billionAlso in September, Worksport announced successful lab test results of its COR battery system as a Level 1 power source for Tesla Inc TSLA EVs. More precisely, the COR added approximately 7 miles of range to Tesla Model 3. By extending range, Worksport addressed a significant EV concern. Therefore, with Worksport’s intellectual portfolio, a moving clean energy microgrid made of pickup trucks powered by solar panels is no longer a dream but a preview of the EV era. 

This new era brings an entirely new set of rules so even one’s legacy isn’t enough of a resource for an automaker to get to shape a new reality that is in the making.

DISCLAIMER: This content is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as investing advice.

This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga’s reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs